User talk:1256wiki

Disambiguation link notification == April 2017

Your addition to Goitered gazelle has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-using references

1256wiki, I am somewhat baffled that you don't seem to know how to re-use an already defined reference. All that busywork at blue iguana could have been avoided by just changing the name of the first definition (in the taxobox) to lowercase "iucn", as that was what every other repeat of the source was already referring to ("name=iucn/"). Instead, your edits recreated the source half dozen times, leading to half a dozen separate and superfluous entries in the reference list. I have seen you do this in several other articles as well. Could you please review WP:NAMEDREFS to avoid making unnecessary work for other editors? Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1256wiki - I really don't know what to to do to get this through to you. You. Don't. Have. To. Reinsert. The. Entire! Reference! Every. Time. You. Reuse. It!!!! Just refer to the name given to it in the first instance, e.g. "<ref name=iucn/>" - with the backslash. There. That does it. Now could you please stop adding bloat to pages and messing up the reflists? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please stop editing the giraffe pages with the wrong taxonomy

User:1256wiki please stop editing the giraffe pages with the wrong taxonomy. IUCN taxonomy is what giraffe experts have agreed to use.DerekELee (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:1256wiki, again, please stop your disruptive editing to the giraffe pages. DerekELee (talk) 06:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't mindlessly paste images into articles

I'm not sure what you think you are doing, but it certainly can't involve taking the least care to produce a well laid-out article... what was the idea of turning Drill (animal) into this [1]? Don't you even check where all the images end up? If you want to add images, please make sure you don't break the layout six ways! I've seen at least half a dozen of these exercises by you. C'mon man... --Elmidae (talk · contribs)

I feel like I'm talking to a wall here... what do you think that image-bombing affair at Northern white-cheeked gibbon looked like, other than a bunch of pictures messily trailing in the wake of the text? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

... at Golden pheasant, copied and minimally changed from here. I mean, what gives? Haven't you been here long enough now to know that is a complete no-go zone? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 04:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 1256wiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

stop disruptive editing to giraffe pages

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerekELee (talk • contribs) 08:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize for the constant refusal to communicate. I'll not refusal to communicate. 1256wiki (talk) 00:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

notice to please stop disruptive editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DerekELee (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've blocked your account indefinitely because you have persistently refused to communicate. This is a collaborative project and communication is mandatory. Refusal to respond to feedback is considered to be disruptive. Users have been pleading with you over various issues for way too long and it ends now. Swarm ♠ 18:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

request for refusal to communicate

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for the devastating editing of the "giraffe" text and my constant refusal to communicate. If you block the address later, I'll be careful when editing the document now.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but given your long history of unconstructive edits, and inability to communicate, I need greater specifics as to what you will or will not do. The problems go far beyond giraffes. It isn't the subject but the nature of your edits, and a vague assurance of being more careful is not going to suffice. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reflection about constant refusal to communicate

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for the constant refusal to communicate. If you block the address later, I'll not refusal to communicate. 1256wiki (talk) 00:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with Dlohcierekim -- you are not sufficiently proficient in written English to be able to effectively contribute to the English Wikipedia. I second the suggestion below to try the Korean version. MER-C 11:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

On reading through the entire thread I feel that we are looking here at a competence problem. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. 1256wiki, I do not think your command of English is adequate. Is there a Korean language Wikipedia? I think it would be best to contribute there.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is unblocked in Korean version. If you block the address later, I'll not refusal to communicate.

Decline reason:

Incoherent unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for the constant refusal to communicate. If you block the address later, I'll not refusal to communicate. And, my account is unblocked in Korean version, so I can't request for unblock in Korean version. I want to you understand about this. I will work hard in the future.

Decline reason:

You need a certain level of English language knowledge to participate in English Wikipedia. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1256wiki (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock request is still barely coherent. ko.wp is a completely separate project from en.wp, with its own community and policies; blocks aren't for all projects unless there is evidence of severe abuse across multiple projects (which is far from the case here). As long as your English skills amount to using automated translation (which has a habit of mangling English-to-East-Asian-languages and vice-versa) it's highly doubtful you will be unblocked on the English-language Wikipedia. This block has zero bearing on your ability to edit the Korean-language Wikipedia, and likewise your ability to edit the Korean-language Wikipedia will not be a factor in this block, which is based almost entirely on your poor command of the English language. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

차단 해제 요청은 여전히 일관성이 있습니다. ko.wp는 자체 커뮤니티 및 정책을 사용하여 en.wp와 완전히 별개의 프로젝트입니다. 블록은 어떤 프로젝트에도 해당되지 않지만 여러 프로젝트에서 심각한 악용 사례가 발견됩니다 (여기서는 멀었습니다). 영어 실력이 변하지 않는 한 영어권 위키피디아에서 차단 해제 될 가능성이 높습니다. 이 블록은 Wikipedia에 게시되었으며 마찬가지로 한국어를 편집 할 수있는 능력은 영어를 기반으로 한이 블록의 요소가 아닙니다. [automated translation; may be inaccurate or incoherent] —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I'm 1256wiki who has been blocked one months ago due to refusal to communicate. I sincerely apologize for the constant refusal to communicate. I didn't know to communicating is necessary about editing text of Wikipedia. If you block the address, I'll not refusal to communicate. I'll do the best for Wikipedia even future.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but the language issues remain. You may be better able to contribute to a project whose language you are more familiar with, possibly the Korean Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 22:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1256wiki (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the issue is less your refusal to communicate and more your inability to do so in understandable English.

다시, 대답은 의사 소통을 거부하는 것입니다. [Automated translation, may be inaccurate or incoherent] —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I was 1256wiki, whose account blocked in the English Wikipedia due to a complete and utter refusal to communicate two months ago. Here are the reasons I requested to unblock; I have a lot of documents I want to edit and have a lot of documents I want to add new information. If you unblock it, I will try my best even more. Thank you for reading and considering my request.

Decline reason:

Please read -revi's message below. At this point we are unable to unblock you here as we require a certain level of proficiency in English as this is a collaborative project. I would suggest that you contribute to the Korean Wikipedia and understand the way the Wiki works and then after a few months if you can show that you'll be able to communicate here effectively and can understand and adhere to our policies and guidelines, then apply for an unblock. Please see WP:SO for an explanation in English. —SpacemanSpiff 11:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your English-language proficiency is the issue here, and no argument you're making helps that - if anything, your arguments are only proving the block is justified, as they have all been in broken English. This is the most coherent request I have seen yet, but there's still a considerable concern about your ability to read/write in English. Again, this is not about refusing to communicate; it's about inability to.

귀하의 영어 실력이 여기에있는 문제이며, 더 쉽게 만들 수 있습니다. 무엇보다도 당신의 주장은 정당합니다. 이것은 가장 일관된 요청이지만 영어로 읽고 쓸 수있는 능력에 대해서는 여전히 많은 부분이 있습니다. 다시 말하지만, 이것은 의사 소통을 거부하는 것이 아닙니다. 그것은 무능력에 관한 것입니다. [Automated translation; may be inaccurate or incoherent. Link added afterward.]] —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment I think we may need an editor who is bilingual in both English and Korean, as the machine translations might have conveyed the wrong meaning to him. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 02:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you entirely here; it seems like the machine translations, as I suspected they would be, are gibberish. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there somewhere where we can request a translator to oversee this? Maybe this can fall under ANI but it's not exactly severe enough to warrant a report. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 11:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe ask someone at Category:User ko-N? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Since this isn't particularly urgent, I figured a few days shouldn't be too much of a wait, since (s)he is on holiday till the 11th, but is an administrator too, and I figured an admin would be more suited to dealing with things like this. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 10:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, while I have superpower~~(button for unblock)~~, I am not an English Wikipedia administartor. I'm one @ Korean edition. Anyway, since I am here... PS: Machine translation here was complete mess and nonsense. Not blaming using it, just telling you it's not that enough comprehensive for Korean. — regards, Revi 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Revi. I figured that was going to be the case, and I apologise for exacerbating things. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refresh

안녕하세요, 약간의 설명을 드리려고 합니다.

이 토론 문서를 읽어 보았을 때, 영어로 의사소통을 하는 데 문제가 있는 것으로 보입니다.

영어 위키백과에서는 "다른 사용자와 문제 없이 의사소통할 수 있을 정도의 영어 능력"이 요구됩니다. 한국어 사이트에서 다른 사용자들과 한국어로 의사소통할 정도의 능력이 요구되는 것과 동일한 것입니다.

죄송하지만 선생님의 영어 능력은 "다른 사람과 문제 없이 영어로 의사소통이 가능"한 레벨은 아니라고 생각합니다. 위의 대화에서 다른 관리자들이 선생님께서 "다른 사람과 충분히 영어를 구사할 수 있"는 정도라는 것을 확신하지 못하고 있기 때문입니다.

현재 상황에서 차단이 해제되실 수 있는 유일한 방법은 (시간이 지나) 더 나은 영어를 구사할 수 있다는 것을 관리자에게 보여주는 수밖에 없습니다.

한국어로 된 문서를 기여하고자 하신다면 한국어 위키백과에서 기여하실 수 있습니다.

좋은 주말 되세요.

(Admins: English comment in .) — regards, Revi 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for chiming in Revi, but if we have to communicate with the user in Korean, that's evidence enough that they should not be editing this Wikipedia. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, that’s true, but people’s English skills can improve over time and he may come back later and prove his competency. I’m linking Korean Wikipedia so he can (meanwhile) use his native language. Nowhere in my message states he will be unblocked overnight. — regards, Revi 13:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't expect you to reply so fast! Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 15:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've had a look at his accounts page, and it looks like his account was made on ko.wp. He's made a grand total of 13 edits to it, all but one of them back in April of this year, between MER-C and Yamla's unblock declines here. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 09:12, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

Please don't remove declined unblock requests as mentioned in bold within the template. Doing so again will mean that you will also lose the ability to edit this talk page. —SpacemanSpiff 12:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I was 1256wiki, whose account had been blocked in the English Wikipedia due to a complete and refusal to communicate three months ago. The reasons to I requests to unblock are such as; I have a lot of documents I want to edits or adds new information. If you unblock it, I will try my best even more. Thank you for reading and considering my request. 1256wiki (talk) 16:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your requests do not address your English skills, which are not adequate for contributing to the English Wikipedia. As you have made several similar requests without change, further requests would be a waste of time, so I am removing your ability to edit this page. You are free to contribute to the Korean Wikipedia, and if your English skills improve, you may request an unblock using WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21750 was submitted on Jun 08, 2018 00:56:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21756 was submitted on Jun 09, 2018 23:19:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

1256wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21934 was submitted on Jun 29, 2018 15:43:29. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]