User talk:1233/Archive 1

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature is causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links, and uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

Please change

<span style="border-radius:99px;background:#9F9;padding:0 35px;" title="Reply" lang="en">[[User:1233|1233]]</span>[[User_talk:1233thehongkonger|<sup style="color:green;">Talk</sup>]]

: 1233^Talk

to

<span style="border-radius:99px;background:#9F9;padding:0 35px;" title="Reply" lang="en">[[User:1233|1233]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:1233thehongkonger|<span style="color:green">Talk</span>]]</sup>

: 1233^Talk

—Anomalocaris (talk) 09:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Will do.

Yours, --1233^Talk 09:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I copied your reply from my talk page to yours to keep it all in one place. It's usually best to reply on the same talk page. There's nothing wrong with using a page like User:1233/Signature, but most users store their signature directly in Special:Preferences. —Anomalocaris (talk) 16:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision accepting

Why did you accept this revision to the Roseanne article when its entire point was spreading false information?--Harmony944 (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Harmony944: My fault, I saw that Season 11 was shot, so I thought that was logical. Many thanks for the revert.--1233^Talk 21:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While it confuses me how you could've seen that season 11 was shot when iZombie (for example) doesn't even get back to the writer's room for another three weeks (as in, most of the industry would probably in closer range of that than a supposed three weeks earlier), I appreciate that it was an honest mistake and not anything out of malice or denial. And you're welcome--Harmony944 (talk) 17:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 11:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi 1233. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm ♠ 23:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Airlines ping

Sorry for the wrong ping. I have also opened a new discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring in relation to the airline destination listing dispute at hand. Deryck C. 12:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Deryck C. 14:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RfC conclusion?

Hello 1233. I've responded here to your AN3 complaint. Please reply, if you know the answer. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 13:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What did you mean by "these really isn't a small thing for Hong Kong citizens". You mean that Hong Kong citizens prefer the country field to say 'Hong Kong' rather than China? At first glance it is hard to see why this is important. EdJohnston (talk) 16:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston:They would rather not fill the country field.--1233^Talk 03:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: (Inhabited) dependent territories have always been and shall be presented as countries and along with countries. This is conventional wisdom to all English-speaking peoples. 203.145.95.209 (talk) 11:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mass message sender granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:

Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.

For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! Swarm ♠ 03:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of Wikimedia User Group Hong Kong

Dear 1233/Archive 1 :

You are receiving this email as you have signed up as an interested member of the Wikimedia User Group Hong Kong, and is active at the English Wikipedia.

This message is sent on behalf of group Liasons of the User Group.

As the mission of the group has been successfully amended, and Liasons elected, the Liasons to affcom have now sent an email to Affcom seeking recognition. However, during the process (which is delayed by the hosting of Wikimania), we have been requested by them Affcom to amend the name of the usergroup (which subsequently mean a change of text of logo as well) as our name did not meet their guidelines.

To resolve this problem, one of the liasons, 1233, has started a discussion on the group's meta talk page(meta) to amend the name of the User Group according to the email received about the recognition of the group. We would hope for more input so as to obtain consensus on this matter and resolve this situation. The discussion will end at 00:00, 1 September (HKT, UTC+8).

In order to speed up the process, we would assume you having no preference if no reply is received on meta.

Many thanks,
1233 (on behalf of the Liasons)
Talk · Page

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please notify the sender. If you want to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message is sent by MediaWiki message delivery at 07:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Union Medical Healthcare Limited (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Union Medical Healthcare Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Union Medical Healthcare Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1233! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For those who did not know why this article is not approved: Special:Permalink/866170108--1233^Talk 15:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 15:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1233. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1233. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Lawyers Group

I've come across your new article Progressive Lawyers Group at Special:NewPages and, not speaking or understanding Chinese I may be misunderstanding what's happening.

You edited zh:法政匯思 and marked it with some kind of copyright problem (16 Jan 13:52).
Then you copied it across to your sandbox (16 Jan 13:55)...
and translated it Special:Permalink/878806492 (17 Jan 01:35),
and then cut-and-pasted it to Progressive Lawyers Group.

I can see it's been edited by a few editors since, Billytanghh, WhisperToMe, Krislcc, & Hayman30 who I hope may help shed some light on my first question

What happened to the copyright issue on the Chinese version. Was it resolved when you copied the article across?

My second question is, Where's the attribution to the Chinese article. The contributors there are due credit for their work, not least since one of them has already tried to create the article here - User:Sailorneptune/sandbox. The guidance in Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources#How about copying from one Wikipedia article to another? & WP:TFOLWP applies. Cabayi (talk) 11:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi:This is the whole story: I originally wanted to translate the article back to English, however after reviewing the article in Chinese, I found out that there is a possible copy issue (the words may be copied from somewhere), so I just literally rewrite everything (except the infobox, which I actually translated and did some minor changes (including changing the key people, etc.) So consider the two articles independent from each other as I did not base the enwp article from the Chinese one after I saw problem. Have plans to translate the English version back to Chinese as the Chinese version is actually so poorly constructed that I would rewrite them.

Short story: 1. There could be Copyedit problem at the Chinese version. It looks like the words were copied from somewhere.

2. I did not translate but literally rewrite the whole article in English, I digested the meaning of the Chinese one and then just rewrite. The copy paste from the Chinese version is due to one thing: need not to open back and forth.

3. No it is not resolved and the only thing that come from the Chinese one is the infobox organisation structure.

4. We were told that the article was deleted ( Progressive lawyers group )due to notability and possible advert issue, so I did the whole thing from scratch.

Thanks for your question --1233 ( T / C） 12:14, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Cabayi (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Special:Diff/901830775 - I'm sorry to hear about the harassment you faced, but I am glad it has not discouraged you from participating in the wikimedia movement! Thank you for that post. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong and Wikipedia question

Hello My name is Omer Benjakob and I am a journalist covering Wikipedia I wanted to know if you would maybe be willing to talk to me about Wikipedia and Hong Kong for a story I am working on

We can talk privately or via email or WeChat if you prefer - my email is omer.benjakob@haaretz.co.il

Best Omer Benjakob (talk) 10:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ring Chromosome 15 has been accepted

Ring Chromosome 15, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physical activity epidemiology has been accepted

Physical activity epidemiology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cell cycle withdrawal has been accepted

Cell cycle withdrawal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muscle-eye-brain syndrome has been accepted

Muscle-eye-brain syndrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Northern

Yes, but for me, it's freezing cold in winter. "Summer" is confusing/misleading for readers in the southern hemisphere. Tony (talk) 12:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for revert

Sorry I had to revert you on the article you created for The Signpost. We are just at the publication deadline, and that one has been finalized. E in C even stated "no more edits please". If there are last minute changes in the story title/blurb, you could bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, E in C restored it [1]. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, Bri, that's nothing wrong there.--1233 ( T / C） 00:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being a contributor

		*The Signpost* Barnstar**
		For being the Community view contributor for the August, 2019 edition of The Signpost. Thanks for making the effort to share your thoughts and analysis. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bri, I didn't write the Op-Ed but the Community view. Nonetheless, thanks for the barnstar.--1233 ( T / C） 04:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh boy. I got mixed up. But the thanks still stand, and I fixed the barnstar. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Lalalalalalalalalalala--Hkgeo4869 (talk) 05:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Helloooooo --Yansytang (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what that's about..

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 06:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is some friendly students testing Wikipedia talk functions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo.--1233 ( T / C） 01:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invasive cervical cancer (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waddie96 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Cervical cancer. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invasive cervical cancer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Invasive cervical cancer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

{{ping|waddie96}} {talk} 10:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1233! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! {{ping|waddie96}} {talk} 10:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ankylosis of teeth has been accepted

Ankylosis of teeth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 17:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autonomic drug has been accepted

Autonomic drug, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 17:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Online Conference call for Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong in 2020

Dear 1233,

Hi. This is 1233, a board member of Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong.

We will soon hold our first online conference call of year 2020 in the coming days. As a major part of preparation work ^[1] will be held in our Telegram group, we wish you to join us in Telegram and are also looking forward to your opinion.

Shall there be any inconvenience or requesting access ^[2] to access Telegram group, please feel free to contact me via email (i.e. williamwchan.hk) ^[3] or leave your Telegram ID on my talk page (Note: This will disclose your Telegram ID to the public).

Note: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong, please remove yourself from the mailing list. If you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

[1] Preparation work include finalizing the date and time
[2] You may also contact WhisperToMe for Telegram access
[3] Or other means if you can find me

Kind regards,
1233 on 09:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This message is sent through the mass message extension by 1233.

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! stwalkerster (talk) 00:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About: Second online meeting of Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong in 2020

Dear 1233,

This is User:1233 from the Hong Kong User Group.

We will be hosting our second online meeting on the Hong Kong User Group's Wikipedia Discord Server [1], where we will be discussing matters that weren't finalized at the last meeting. We will also be discussing the future of the User Group at the same time. Please join us on the server at that date. If you do not have a Discord account, please feel free to register one or contact me for more details.

[1]: Hong Kong User Group's Discord Server: https://discord.gg/7chaCt

Kind regards,
1233 on 14:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong, please remove yourself from the mailing list. If you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
This message is sent through the mass message extension by 1233.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mali Wu (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not write 'She is considered the "godmother" of Taiwan's socially engaged art' in the voice of Wikipedia. If a critic has said this, quote them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mali Wu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mali Wu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1233! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Topical cream formulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissolution. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark

Hello
You added the 'over-coloured' template to this page a while ago; what do you see as the problem, here? Moonraker12 (talk) 20:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonraker12: Normally, with a black background (in a table), text should go default in white. However, because there are links, it turned blue and contrast do not meet the standards as a result. I do not know if the black background (on banknote tab) is intentional or not, but that is where the problem lies. 1233 ( T / C） 23:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK...Are there standards written down somewhere? Guidelines on using colours? (I don’t know) AFAIK we can’t change the colour the links display in, but the background colour should be easy to adjust; which colour would be most suitable? Or the links could be moved; I don’t know that it’s essential they be in that position. I had thought the problem was with the orange contrasting with the grey, though I have no idea why those bits use orange at all; for my money they could go completely... Moonraker12 (talk) 21:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's WCAG 2.0 (now recommended to do WCAG 2.2), a global standard on colour/visual compatibility. I think the best is just to remove the colour, considering the use of the colour is near zero - unless it conveys some message. The problem is blue on black. 1233 ( T / C） 04:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link (though I have to say it's a bit complex for a bear of very small brain); But I would agree the colour serves little purpose, and taking it out would match the banknote tables further down. Do you want to do it or shall I? Moonraker12 (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it's fine for you to do that - it is not that controversal, and the reason why I leave that template is mainly due to my (also small brain) inability to decide what can be best done to resolve that issue - so I identified an issue but not resolving that. 1233 ( T / C） 05:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Done. I've taken the liberty of copying this discussion to the talk page there, as an explanation of what has happened. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]