User talk:122.106.83.10

Recent edit to Liberal Party of Australia leadership spills, 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Liberal Party of Australia leadership spills, 2018, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 17:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Schipp

Here at Wikipedia, we rely on verifiability. If we cannot verify information through independent, reliable sources, then it doesn't go in. You are not a reliable source. Neither am I. That's why we go on what the sources say, and in this case the sources do not say what you're trying to add to the article. Frickeg (talk) 08:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Leadership spill have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Dan Koehl (talk) 09:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

adding material

WP:BLP when added to - require WP:RS for WP:V - otherwise it gets reverted as WP:OR JarrahTree 07:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bill Byrne (politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies

I just realized that I misread a few words in the content added, which made me believe that it was opinionated commentary - it clearly is not. I've restored the content to the page; please accept my sincere apologies for misreading the content, and please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD|Talk 16:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ian Taylor (Australian politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

re Paul Toole

re your comments about the addition of a reference to changes to Paul Toole. It is the responsibility of the editor adding the information to supply the reference, not to others who review the edit. It is noted that this is not the first time you have had edits reverted because of a lack of references.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Sorry for the revert. I self-reverted and changed a little bit. --94rain ^Talk 11:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leadership election

Your assertion ("leadership election" non-existent in Australian language) is incorrect. Here are numerous examples from various reliable sources.

"This highlights a flaw in Labor’s leadership election process." [1]
"he has, since the 2013 leadership election changes, been focusing on the more impressionable Labor membership" [2]
"The 1968 ballot was the first modern leadership election" [3]
"Labor party rules requiring a ballot of all ordinary members in a leadership election" [4]
"a leader cannot be ousted until 60 per cent of caucus members sign a petition requesting a new leadership election" [5]
"In the days prior to the leadership election, Turnbull was forced backflip" [6]
"the party's new system of leadership election was seemingly designed by former leader Kevin Rudd" [7]

There are also many Australian Wikipedia articles that include "leadership election" (Leadership election#Australia). WWGB (talk) 07:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.