User talk:11lionsd

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandro Mencucci (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:11lionsd/sandbox/Sandro Mencucci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 12:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 11lionsd, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 12:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandro Mencucci (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

First, there is much here that isn't referenced, and this is way too wordy. Reduce the article down to the information that can be verified in reliable sources. Second, the team's wins are not his awards, they are awards to the team and should be on the team page. This is his personal page, and any awards should be ones given to him directly with his name on them.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandro Mencucci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 17:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandro Mencucci (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandro Mencucci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandro Mencucci (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandro Mencucci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 11lionsd. You have new messages at Liance's talk page.
Message added 17:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

email question

Hi. You emailed me the following question:

I would like to ask a few questions regarding my article. I have had two pictures deleted that are free public domain with the explanation that the pictures can be found on several Google sites. The subject in question has himself given public domain permission to both images. Do you have any suggestions of how to resolve this? My second question is regarding a newspaper article I found in hard copy. It is not available online in any digital form. How could I still reference it? I called the paper Corriere Fiorentina to ask them why I could not find an online link and they said that back then they had to pick and choose which article to post online from the hard copy printed paper. The article I am referencing which is an important feature article is and had never been made digital online. There is however the hard copy. Thank you for all of your suggestions.

It's easier for me to respond here than via email. Regarding the deletion of pictures, you should really ask the editor who deleted them. But just because something is on the internet does not mean that it is public domain. In fact, the vast majority of images on the internet are not public domain. You have to look for the license on the website where it is posted. Regarding the newspaper, it is perfectly okay to use sources not available online, but when you do, you must provide all relavent information. Look at WP:CIT to see everything needed and the format, but in a nutshell it's: paper name, page #, date, title, author, and the city of publication. Hope this helps. Yes in fact, I called the Club just now and they explained to me that the journalists in Italy that are invited by the Club to a game choose to send to the Club photos that were and were not published. The exchange for the invitation to the game is that the Club then owns the rights to those pictures. The Club's Media department as authorized the usage of the photo and they are looking through their archives to tell me exactly who took the picture. In this case, I am not referring to a picture that I took from online because it was there, but rather I received a cd of pictures I was authorized to use for the creation of this article. As soon as I hear back I will submit the proof of this authorization. Where do I send it once I receive it? Therefore there is no longer any doubts to whether the picture is free and of public domain. Thank you for your assistance once again. 11lionsd ^{TT me} 21:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The club has sent the email authorizing my usage of the pictures and odd Giles from their archive. They fortunately copied me on the email. Where could I send the email. [Ticket#: 2016030710012501]. 11lionsd (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sandro Mencucci has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandro Mencucci. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandro Mencucci (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

WP:CITEKILL doesn't help. He's accomplished, but does not appear to be notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandro Mencucci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mencucci

I have cleaned up and published the Sandro Mencucci article. Clearly meets WP:GNG requirements. I would highly recommend adding links to it from the respective club pages soon. I'd also recommend creating an article for the women's club. You can see other examples: here

Hmlarson (talk) 01:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HmlarsonThat is incredible you are amazing!! I also have a photo that I have a photo that would go in the graph to which I have Wiki Commons permission 4.0 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_mencucci_ceo_fiorentina.jpg I will work on the citations needed and I am so appreciative for your assistance. 11lionsd (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hmlarson (talk) 01:20, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will be working on the Fiorentina Women's FC next. Thanks again! 11lionsd (talk) 13:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sandro Mencucci

Hello, 11lionsd. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sandro Mencucci".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from RB Leipzig into Ralf Rangnick. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]