User talk:117.247.85.156

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Satyajit Ray. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (117.247.85.156) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! IM3847 (talk) 15:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 09:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury. Jim1138 (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathindranath tagore (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rathindranath tagore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 21:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello! 117.247.85.156, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 21:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathindranath Tagore (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rathindranath Tagore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathindranath Tagore (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rathindranath Tagore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathindranath Tagore (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rathindranath Tagore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 10:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathindranath Tagore (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rathindranath Tagore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Before you request an unblock, I'd like clarification on the following issues:

1. In this edit, why did you arbitrarily reorganize the cast? Shah Rukh Khan and Mahira Khan are featured prominently on the film's poster, yet you inexplicably moved Siddiqui to the front and the Pakistani actress to the back of the list.
2. In these edits you move a bunch of stuff around the page without providing a single edit summary, you removed several notes and inexplicably removed references. What was your rationale for these changes?
3. In this edit, you changed Akhshay Kumar's participation in Dil To Pagal Hai from a supporting role to a starring role. What was your rationale there? I only see three people on the film's poster, and Kumar ain't there. What Wikipedia guidelines were you following when you made this change? It wasn't the instructions at Template:Infobox film...
4. In this edit you added a wikilink for a non-existent article. Why?
5. Draft:Rathindranath Tagore is an article you've been working on for a couple of weeks. You submitted it for consideration, but it was declined for having no references. You submitted it again, but it was declined for having no sources. You submitted it again, but it yet again declined for having no references and then you submitted it again with no references, resulting in the draft being declined again. At what point are you going to take the hint on this? I gotta say, I have serious questions about your ability to edit here constructively.
6. By the way, you previously created a draft on the same subject at Draft:Rathindranath tagore. Note the mis-capitalisation of Tagore? So you've basically got two insufficient draft articles going.
7. In these edits you refactored another editor's talk page comments. Why?

Please note that unless you address each of these issues satisfactorily below, I will oppose any unblock request you make. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC) 117.247.85.156 (talk) 10:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

   * According to Daily News and Analysis, Nawazuddin Siddiqui stole the show in Raees and Shah Rukh Khan played a negative role.
   * In Dil To Pagal Hai, Akshay Kumar played an important role, and it was the film-maker's fault for not showing him in the film poster.
   * You should also have already written about Rathindranath Tagore and Sisir Kumar Bose.
   * Abhishek Bachchan was the protagonist in both Dhoom 2 and Dhoom 3, so his name should be first in credits. Bobby Deol was the protagonist in Ajnabee, so his name should also be first in credits.
   * If Sukumar Ray, Satyajit Ray, and Sandip Ray have the surname 'Ray', then why doesn't Sukumar Ray's father Upendrakishore have?
   * I had done a necessary change in the infobox of the article about Abdul Latif, then why did you change it?

I've moved your response to the bottom of the page, where new replies intuitively would belong. You've done very little to demonstrate that you understand any of the problems that led to your block and you've glossed over several of the questions. "Siddiqui stole the show in Raees"? What on earth does that mean? Are you trying to say that because he received praise for his performance that he becomes the chief star of the film? That makes no sense. "Starring" is a special credit that producers, not editors, determine. Cast order is typically something that producers determine, not editors. The relevant guidelines are at Template:Infobox film and WP:FILMCAST. You don't get to arbitrarily decide that Siddiqui or Kumar deserve prominence in a cast list based on some fabricated rule floating around in your head. And blaming the film-maker for what you apparently think is a mistake, is absurd. If a producer publishes a billing block, that's what we go with in the Infobox. If that's not available, we can use onscreen film credits. Your belief that protagonists should be listed first by default is also bizarre and not motivated by any established Wikipedia guideline or academic principle.

I don't understand your question about Upendrakishore or how it is relevant to the questions I've asked you. You should probably focus on answering the questions in the space below, since my job is to basically decide whether or not I think you're capable of editing here constructively. So far, I don't have a strong sense of that. You're rationales for #1 and #3 were poor. You didn't answer #2, #4, #5, #6 or #7 as far as I can tell. Well, I guess you sort of answered #5 and #6 by suggesting that the reason why you created duplicate, unsourced draft articles, and resubmitted an unsourced draft article over and over again was "You should also have already written about Rathindranath Tagore and Sisir Kumar Bose." Is that your real answer? The reason why you created duplicate article drafts was because someone should have already written about Rathindranath Tagore? What? The reason why you couldn't add any references to the draft article was because someone should have already written about Rathindranath Tagore? What? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 11:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 03:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Waterloo, you may be blocked from editing. KH-1 (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Origin (Brown novel). CLCStudent (talk) 03:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathindranath Tagore (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rathindranath Tagore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rathindranath Tagore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm Z0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dhoom 3, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The editor whose username is Z0 09:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dhoom 3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 03:51, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rathindranath Tagore

Hello, 117.247.85.156. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rathindranath Tagore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 09:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to File:Baahubali The Beginning poster.jpg, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to God in Christianity. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 07:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I am not aware about this. I didn't make any edits in that webpage.

One's IP address may change. Someone else may have done the edits. Feel free to blank the page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Kadane. An edit that you recently made to Baahubali: The Beginning seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Kadane (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---