User talk:115.69.47.212

October 2013

Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lisa Robin Kelly, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 11:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Lisa Robin Kelly, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

In order to add a birth date to Lisa Robin Kelly, you will need to cite a reliable source for the date. Mentioning a source in an edit summary is not sufficient. Please see WP:CITE for information on how to add in-line citations. Additionally, IMDb is not an acceptable source for biographical data, as that section of the site is essentially user submitted. For information on what would be acceptable, please see Identifying reliable sources. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lisa Robin Kelly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Thanks. SummerPhD (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lisa Robin Kelly, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:57, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. I, too, am watching this page. Wikipedia disallows the wikia IMDb as a reference source. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Melbourne3163. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cop Shop (12:25, 21 October 2013), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melbourne3163 (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing via the repeated addition of unsourced content to articles despite multiple requests to state your sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced content to articles, as you did to the Cop Shop article on 13 December 2013. The original information that was in this article is correct and your change was unnecessary. Melbourne3163 (talk) 13:50, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Adam Nimoy , but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Johnny Young. You have replaced verified birth details with unreferenced material. A similar series of edits were made by you in January 2012, which similarly replaced birth details without suitable references.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doris Day. Her year of birth is clearly disputed, and the current format must remain until the dispute is settled. IMDb is not considered a reliable source for biographical data. Quis separabit? 12:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sandra Denton. --Ronz (talk) 16:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Werewolves of London. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2019

Hello, I'm Cristabel0. I wanted to let you know that your edit on Michael Hutchence have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. - Cristabel0 (talk) 21:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Frankie Smith, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Frankie Smith. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Thanks. 38.106.246.200 (talk) 14:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NJA | talk 15:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unsourced and poorly-sourced birth dates

Please stop adding unsourced and poorly-sourced content to biographical articles. Wikipedia has strict rules on content in biographies of living persons because this can impact real peoples' lives. Please be aware the many sites on the internet purport to give information about celebrities, but few of them of reliable sources. Sites like the IMDb use user-generated content, and they should not be cited in biographical articles. Similarly, celebrity gossip websites should not be used because most of them don't have a history of fact checking or publishing corrections. We also can't use primary documents, such as government birth databases. This means that the number of available sources is quite slim, and we have to either go without this information or wait until a source like Entertainment Weekly publishes an interview that includes this information. If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, you can ask at WP:RSN. If you continue to add poorly-sourced content, you'll be blocked for a much longer time than the previous blocks, which have apparently not deterred your behavior. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Nelson (band). Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fifth Beatle, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.