User talk:111JoeI111

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sex assignment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Funcrunch (talk) 02:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Connecticut has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Connecticut was changed by 111JoeI111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953604 on 2017-08-08T18:52:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Star Wars was changed by 111JoeI111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86194 on 2017-08-08T22:15:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Great Furry War

The article The Great Furry War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines at WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 03:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Great Furry War

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:The Great Furry War, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Red Pill, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have previously added user reviews which are from unreliable sources. See WP:UGC. Please do not do this again. IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes are not reliable sources for audience reviews and can and have been manipulated Robynthehode (talk) 15:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Red Pill. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Robynthehode (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Red Pill. Robynthehode (talk) 16:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]