User talk:107.77.205.21

August 2016

Hello, I'm Intelligentsium. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Platoon (1987 video game)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Intelligentsium 18:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Jason McBain

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jason McBain, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bull shark— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 19:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bull shark. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bull shark was changed by 107.77.205.21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955517 on 2017-07-09T19:37:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Daniela Vega— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:06, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Daniela Vega. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 06:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Daniela Vega, you may be blocked from editing. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 06:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Daniela Vega. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 06:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniela Vega. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniela Vega was changed by 107.77.205.21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924731 on 2018-03-05T07:17:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:17, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hut 8.5 07:31, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.