User talk:107.147.190.172

Attention:

This IP address, 107.147.190.172, is registered to Charter Communications, US. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

whats a charter

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Deep Purple band members. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 02:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look, all I'm asking is for you to discuss these changes before you make them. No reason to call someone you don't know names. If working with a community is too hard or inconvenient for you, then maybe you should find something else to do. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 02:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of the Yardbirds members.

No consensus for changes to long standing timeline - FlightTime (open channel) 14:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chester Bennington. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dolfinz1972 (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to King Crimson. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Electric Light Orchestra. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

107.147.190.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a passion for editing Wikipedia pages, and when I add information (which is true) I am continuously reverted, warned, dissed and threatened with blocks by people like Flight Time. He think's i'm a troll, which I am clearly not, and finally blocked me today. Thanks, jerk. I just want to edit. Please, unblock me. 107.147.190.172 (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also note that any block appeals that include personal attacks will be summarily declined.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you guys please stop?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

107.147.190.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My previous request was declined. The reason states 3 reasons why it was declined, and I believe that these are untrue. The reasons are: 1. You understand what you have been blocked for, 2. You will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and 3. will make useful contributions instead. My reply to that is: 1. I honestly don't know what i was blocked for 2. I never caused damage/disruption 3. Every edit I have made has been useful in one way or another. I am sad beyond belief that everyone at Wikipedia has been so hostile and non transparent with me thus far, and I hope that you will take my request into consideration.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for "Persistent addition of unsourced content". Stop making personal attacks, stop blaming everyone else. Take responsibility for your own actions, assuming you are the person who made all the edits (including the outright vandalism, such as this disgusting piece of work). Note that because you aren't using an account, you might not be responsible. To avoid being tied to the obvious vandal operating from this IP address, please consider registering an account in the future. Yamla (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2019

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from making timeline changes as you did on The Rolling Stones, changes to timelines require establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. It has been removed and archived in the page history for now.

Timeline changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Rolling Stones; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is my very final warning to you. I’m fucking sick and tired of your disruptive editing for the last 2 weeks. I don’t want to go any further anymore and practically other users have warned you on your disruptive editing. A.R.M. 02:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 10cc. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A.R.M. 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sasquatch t|c 23:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Guess Who. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at List of Night Ranger members. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Admin

@SQL: Can you block this IP for about 6 months, please. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Iron Maiden.

unsourced, unexplained date changes, No discussion either - FlightTime (open channel) 21:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 23:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

got blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

107.147.190.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what warrants a 1 year block for changing one thing on an article, it's not like i brought down the entire page107.147.190.172 (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been disruptive for over a year. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2021

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 801st Medical Air Evacuation Squadron—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RacoonyRE ^{Message me}_{Contributions} 19:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ShowBiz Pizza Place have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GoneIn60 (talk) 03:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boston (album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Winger (band), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dokken, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kool & the Gang. Binksternet (talk) 05:30, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Squier, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how in the hell is that defamatory? he hasn't played a show since 2014 and has released nothing. that is RETIREMENT. I'm mostly amused that you find me stating that to be "defamatory". 107.147.190.172 (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.