User talk:0x803A

License tagging for Image:Bandook Rat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bandook Rat.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

January 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bandook, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 11:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bandook Rat.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Bandook, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 20:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bandook, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BOVINEBOY2008 22:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UNETHICAL OF YOU

This page i have created in 2005 for Bandook Rat , you came in 2013 and unethically changed it totally , you can check back the content in 2007 here http://web.archive.org/web/20071214230652/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandook , please stop changing the original content

Recent edits to Bandook

See the talk page. Thank you! APerson (talk!) 23:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Bandook

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I see an edit war is under way on this article. I will create a second article, to solve the dispute, in the next 24 hours. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New article created as promised

I have created Bandook Rat, which contains all the content in dispute. Further statements are on its talk page. --Greenmaven (talk) 05:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M.E.R.M

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on M.E.R.M, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 22:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Stop the edit war in Bandook and listen to me. The page has previously been deleted, you may click "View logs on this page" on top of the page's history to see. There, you may contact the administrator who deleted the page and asked him why he did it. He may instruct you how to create the page again without being questioned. Thanks. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 09:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hey 2

they started it , they edited the original content check http://web.archive.org/web/20071214230652/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandook

April 2014

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bandook because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 00:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Bandook. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple editors have warned you that changing an article's subject is not allowed, alongside a note that the original page was deleted for not being notable. I can only advice ceasing these edits after the block expires, as another block for the same issue will likely be indefinite. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo top.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo top.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. User:Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]