User talk:0x0F

Welcome!

Hello, 0x0F, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

I see that you are edit-warring against consensus in Dnipropetrovsk [1]. Please note that WP:Edit warring is not a valid avenue of dispute resolution and can lead to blocks. In fact, you are pretty close to one. Please stop and discuss.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Это не было войной правок. Я привёл контраргумент в истории правок. Ок, я отвечу вам более развёрнуто чуть позже.(Возможно на английском языке на старанице обсуждения той статьи.) С уважением, 0x0F (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Dnipropetrovsk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! But I know about it, becous the Russian Wikipedia have the same rules. 0x0F (talk) 14:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:0x0F/Datacoin

Hello, 0x0F. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Datacoin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 05:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:0x0F/Datacoin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:0x0F/Datacoin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 10^Eleventeen 19:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]