User talk:0wikimaster

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Erwise, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed content from Microsoft Word without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Microsoft Word. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Microsoft Word, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pulp (juice) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pulp (juice) was changed by 0wikimaster (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859106 on 2022-01-09T23:45:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mandatory paid editing disclosure

Hello 0wikimaster. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:0wikimaster. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=0wikimaster|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

== no == 0wikimaster (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a black hat SEO person or a paid advocate.

That is not what was asked. Are you being compensated in any way for editing Wikipedia? That is not necessarily the same thing as black hat SEO or paid advocate. Those folks are blocked. Legimiately disclosed paid editors who work within the policies and guidelines are not blocked. Most of your edits seem to have been promotional in tone and largely unsourced. We have legitmate paid editors here. The point is that they disclose it. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not being compensated in any way to edit Wikipedia. Nor do I have an employer, client or affiliation. 0wikimaster (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to NATO phonetic alphabet—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WikiPilipinas. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: WikiPilipinas was changed by 0wikimaster (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906129 on 2022-02-21T00:58:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cocomelon have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cocomelon was changed by 0wikimaster (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88738 on 2022-03-04T02:17:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Super Mario Bros.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Super Mario Bros., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiko Buds 10 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Wiko Buds 10. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 03:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. Your recent edit to List of IIT Kharagpur alumni appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SplashLearn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SplashLearn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 13:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the speedy deletion nomination and moved the article to Draft:SplashLearn for improvement. Don't try to move it back to article space yourself. Submit it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]