User talk:0lida0

October 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Wadham College, Oxford people appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

How was my edit "whitewashing"?

Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but here we go:

How was my edit on Views of Elon Musk whitewashing what Elon said? He believed that more fair referendums should be held on the status of those regions, which is what I wrote. I believe I covered it in a neutral manner, showing the opposition to his claims as well. He never said Russia should just annex the regions, and to me, your edit seems like it's pushing a POV. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

I am going to have to correct this again I'm afraid. Ceding annexed territory is not a peace plan however much you try and style it, and I am starting to suspect a conflict of interest on your part. 0lida0 (talk) 06:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

He didn't outright say that Ukraine should cede annexed territory, but rather supported referendums in the annexed territories over the issue. There is a big difference.

As for whether or not it was a "peace plan", it is not our call to judge what his intentions were when making the proposal. I deliberately put it in quotes because whether or not the plan can achieve peace is disputed, but it is still what he called it. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

He can call anything anything and have it repeated verbatim. Hypothetically speaking, if those regions overwhelmingly voted to join Russia then those votes would be coming from the people who hadn't been murdered or deported because they don't get to vote. That is not a peace plan. He also suggested that Ukraine cede Crimea. 0lida0 (talk) 19:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Marc Bennetts moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marc Bennetts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring at Views of Elon Musk

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ HAL333 16:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Apologies but the reverter in question was a new account and seemed to have an impassioned personal interest in changing the content on the page, I have set up a talk page in order to resolve this 0lida0 (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc Bennetts (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marc Bennetts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 0lida0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc Bennetts (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marc Bennetts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patreon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 22:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

it wasn't vandalism, it's true, there is a section on the page devoted to it. will re-add with citation, though 0lida0 (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Adding it to the lead is WP:UNDUE weight, and linking to a single alleged pro-Russian activist isn't good sourcing. Please don't re-add it. — Czello ^(music) 12:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

what the hell is a "pro-Russian activist"?!?? Do you not understand what is going on in Ukraine the moment? 0lida0 (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The point is that we don't link out to random accounts. Please stop. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Marc Bennetts

Hello, 0lida0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marc Bennetts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marc Bennetts

Hello, 0lida0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marc Bennetts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 16:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

sorry, seemed like the heritages of various celebrities were already mentioned further down page, was just bringing them further up in articles - so assumed citations further down would suffice. atomic heart and musk edits were cleaner but can add a source on gazprom if you like. 0lida0 (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astlibra (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astlibra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 23:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astlibra has been accepted

Astlibra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello 0lida0! Your additions to 2007 Gombe State gubernatorial election have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Since WP:GS/SCW&ISIL and WP:RUSUKR have not yet fully migrated to the contentious topics system, these clunky templates are unfortunately still required for notification per WP:OLDDS:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 07:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topics alert

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Mellk (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

You were already alerted about WP:RUSUKR. Editors who are not extended confirmed may not make edits about the Russo-Ukrainian war, broadly construed. Mellk (talk) 17:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

This includes edits such as this and this. If it continues, this will likely to lead to an indefinite block as you are not extended confirmed. Mellk (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:0lida0 and WP:RUSUKR. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

See this

Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, subject to the following provisions: A. The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed, with the following exceptions:

1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions described in "B" or "C" below. However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even within the "Talk:" namespace. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, Articles for deletion nominations, WikiProjects, requests for comment, requested moves, and noticeboard discussions.

2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

B. If a page (other than a "Talk:" page) mostly or entirely relates to the topic area, broadly construed, this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection, though this is not required.

C. On any page where the restriction is not enforced through extended confirmed protection, this restriction may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.

D. Reverts made solely to enforce this restriction are not considered edit warring. Doug Weller talk 12:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Seen, thanks 0lida0 (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

tbh I assumed Mellk was a troll because he kept reverting well-sourced edits 0lida0 (talk) 13:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

And now hopefully you understand why. Those edits should not have been made. Doug Weller talk 14:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Well, I still don't agree with his reversions as they were good edits, but I see now that there was a real policy implemented in October 2022. 0lida0 (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)