User talk:0O21Lam76ptarmigan

Welcome!

Hi 0O21Lam76ptarmigan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 21:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shirley MacLaine, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - FlightTime (open channel) 22:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley MacLaine Parker is her legal name.--0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 22:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, as long you provide a reliable source to support that claim. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fulton County, Georgia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, there is the 11Alive source. Why don't you add the source? Why don't you use the {fact} tag? Do you prefer to troll me?--0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 22:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed to 14Jenna7Caesura.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a legitimate reason for using this account. I am not using multiple account. My past account is closed and never used again. You could e-mail me and ask about my current account.--0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly stop editing with 14Jenna7Caesura account if you choose, but you cannot edit with any other accounts or while purposefully logged out while the topic ban is in place. That topic ban applies to you, not the 14Jenna7Caesura account. What you're describing is a WP:CLEANSTART and is not available to editors who have active sanctions on their account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Why am I blocked?--0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 23:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Through a variety of investigative techniques, a WP:checkuser has determined that you are abusing multiple accounts to get around a block or a ban. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Ponyo superseded me. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

0O21Lam76ptarmigan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a legitimate reason to use this account. My past account is closed. I don't use multiple accounts. 0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser toool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 06:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK. I'll bite. What past account are you referring to? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14Jenna7Caesura is turned off for good. I am not a sockpuppet. --0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 02:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm afraid this is a sockpuppet account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was told by editors passionate about gender to not edit pages with a gender tag--I haven't. I only use this account to avoid being stalked. Gangin up on an innocent user to vote her off a platform like a Big Brother TV show is heavy-handed, abusive, and uncalled for. This is beating a dead horse.--0O21Lam76ptarmigan (talk) 02:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is/was stalking you. You are free to make edits via your original account that do not violate your topic ban. Once that block expires. The subtext of what you are saying is that you wish to violate your topic ban without being held accountable for it. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read what you wrote. You could have made edits that did not violate your topic ban with the original account. The appearance is that you made test edits as a prelude to violating your topic ban actively. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create more socks. It would only make matters worse when you dot caught and it would disappoint Tamzin --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]