User talk:06jay007
06jay007, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi 06jay007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC) |
Warning
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --RaviC (talk) 09:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
What makes me prove vandalising? I am just reinstating the section which was written by someone else but removed by you. Vandalism may be removing such section, but as per your opinion reinstating it is. Who shall decide what's right?
March 2019 : Stop Edit War
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- Please use the talk page and come to consensus before making any significant changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dheerajmpai23 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- Don't accuse people of bad faith editing. If you did this again then I will report you. Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Final Warning
[edit]Your recent editing history at 2019 Indian general election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is your final warning.Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Talk Page
[edit]Don't write anything on My User page! You can leave Message for any Topic only on My talk page! Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Please understand that discussion should be in talk page. Please understand Userpage and Talk page are different. Editing Userpage is against the community guidelines of Wikipedia. Please avoid doing so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dheerajmpai23 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of politicians who joined Indian National Congress before Lok Sabha Election 2019
[edit]Hello, 06jay007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of politicians who joined Indian National Congress before Lok Sabha Election 2019".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of politicians who joined Indian National Congress before Lok Sabha Election 2019
[edit]Hello, 06jay007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of politicians who joined Indian National Congress before Lok Sabha Election 2019".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)