User talk:01rayws

Speedy deletion of Abberley and Malvern Hills Geopark

A tag has been placed on Abberley and Malvern Hills Geopark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pnswmr (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, 01rayws. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fordhall Farm

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fordhall Farm, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.seekitout.co.uk/item.php?id=11. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

If I took a severe view I could speedily delete the article on the strength of this AfD discussion but I am feeling kind. However you do need to work hard on it to establish its notabilty. The 2006 version was little better than yours - I can let you have a copy of it is you set up an e-mail address! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Fordhall Farm has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Fordhall Farm constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Fordhall Farm. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mdebets (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gloucestershire Geology Trust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gloucestershire Geology Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloucestershire Geology Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parish and Town Councils in Gloucestershire

Template:Parish and Town Councils in Gloucestershire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]