User talk:윤은강/Archive

Welcome!

Hi 윤은강! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

$'YEG.talk.contribe.'$ 04:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your article 0.05

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page 0.05 to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

0.05 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 0.05, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 0.05 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. We cannot have redirects to draftspace per WP:XNR; a move which would normally make this redirect eligible for speedy deletion. The current target is an alternative to a page under construction. Please add sources to your current draft and submit through the Articles for creation process before publishing. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 0.05. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please re-read what I said above about WP:XNR and WP:R2. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1/20, you may be blocked from editing. This is not how you publish a draft! Please stop redirecting to it. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 윤은강! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I'm from korean wikipedia., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 0.0.0.0.0.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 0.0.0.0.0. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wretchskull (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because i want to move Draft:0.05 to 0.05. --🇰🇷Republic of korea🇰🇷 (KOREA) 09:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is, 윤은강, that the article claims no significance and has no content at all. Not entirely sure what you are trying to do. Wretchskull (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already created many articles in Korean wikipedia.

$'YEG.talk.contribe.'$ 11:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 0.05

The article 0.05 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable number (apart from maybe p value but that's hardly worth mentioning here)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 윤은강, what would you say is the goal of your edits? We sometimes mention interesting numerical properties of numbers, but I can't see any indication that 0.05 is considered an interesting number. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 0.05 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 0.05 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0.05 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jalen Folf (talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean?

--🇰🇷Republic of korea🇰🇷 (talk|Contribs) 05:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of numbers

Hello 윤은강, we try to summarize what reliable sources say. If reliable sources haven't discussed the number 85000 then there's very little one can write about it, and the number is likely not notable enough for an article. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 85000

The article 85000 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable number in any way.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Hello there. I noticed you have hardcoded userboxes on your user page. Have you considered using our existing userbox templates as an alternative? For the ones you're using right now, we have Template:User male and Template:User from Korea. Hope this helps! Jalen Folf (talk) 21:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jalenfolf: Thank you.

--🇰🇷Republic of korea🇰🇷 (talk|Contribs) 04:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

In case you didn't see the note at the Teahouse, I wanted to mention that your signature, which renders in yellow and gray on white for most users, is difficult to see. You might consider a different (darker) foreground colors, per MOS:ACCESSIBILITY. Also, I think you probably meant "contribs" instead of "contribe". —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 21:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AlanM1: Because i used that signature in korean wikipedia, only language changed.

In korean wikipedia:

--$'YEG.토론.기여.'$

In english wikipedia:

--$'YEG.talk.contribe.'$ 03:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Perryprog was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:윤은강/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:윤은강/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Perryprog (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 윤은강! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Perryprog (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK.

$'YEG.talk.contribe.'$ 03:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Coconut's lifecycle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Coconut's lifecycle. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Coconut. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Coconut. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mario Jump 83! 10:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Owen250708. I noticed that you recently removed content from Coconut milk without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Owen250708 (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]