User talk:시월의여우비

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Illit, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 09:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 11:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Illit, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you recently removed the content I added about Illit. Could you please clarify why the information was removed? I believe the content was backed by reliable sources and met Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. And these are the reasons why the information should be included in Illit's category in wikipedia: 1. Verifiability: The facts are backed by credible sources, including Billboard, the Japan Record Association, and major news outlets. Wikipedia requires verifiable and reliable references, and I’ve provided solid sources for each claim. 2. Notability: Illit has achieved significant milestones that indicate their importance in the music industry, such as setting records on major charts (Billboard, Spotify, Apple Music). These accomplishments help establish notability, a key criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. 3. Historical Context: By being the first girl group to reach certain achievements (e.g., debuting on the Billboard Hot 100 and Global 200 simultaneously, achieving a record for highest first-week album sales), Illit is making history in K-pop. This context adds value to Wikipedia's mission of documenting cultural moments. 4. Broader Relevance: Their global impact, such as dominating charts in multiple countries and platforms (Korea, Japan, the U.S.), and their success across various media formats (streaming, music shows, short-form videos), makes the group relevant to a wide audience beyond K-pop fans. This adds international relevance to Wikipedia’s content.If there are any specific issues with the content or sources, I would appreciate any suggestions on how to improve it so it aligns better with Wikipedia's guidelines 시월의여우비 (talk) 10:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Illit. — Chyx1095 (🗣️ • 📜) 12:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]