User talk:特克斯特/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and (albeit garbled) personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

ok, I will come back soon. :) @The Banner: I will talk with you after 72 hours, I go to zh-wiki, bye, 72 hours talks later.特克斯特 (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Is this a threat?

But let me be clear: when you display the same disruptive behaviour after your block, the response will be quicker. And longer. The Banner talk 20:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

I also want to state that Drmies is doing so unuseful editing.特克斯特 (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Sir, during a block, you can use your talkpage only to discuss your block. It is not for throwing out more accusations or do edit requests. But the useless, inaccurate editing is all from your side. The Banner talk 07:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@The Banner: @Drmies:Why inaccurate editing is all from my side? You are totally wrong, is Drmies clean the flags when he clean he should notice the brackets etc. this is the responsibility of him (because the flags is cleaned by him, not clean by me, now have these problems is due to he haven't notice the brackets, so do I have the responsibility on this? Of course no, do you familiar with the things now?).特克斯特 (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Singer 2018 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Singer 2018 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singer 2018 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Crystal ball

Please do not add info to articles about TV-programs that were not already on TV. It might be true that the preparations are ongoing, but the only thing that matters is the actual broadcast. And it should be sourced with independent, reliable sources. The Banner talk 08:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Singer 2018

I've reverted the speedy deletion objection you posted at Singer 2018, because it has not been nominated for speedy deletion. It has been nominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singer 2018, so that's the place you should post your objection (which I see you have already done). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Singer 2018. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singer 2018. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not add fake closure templates on an AfD. The Banner talk 18:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to I Am a Singer (season 4), without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. The Banner talk 16:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

I have given the solution already. You haven't seen it carefully and want to block me?特克斯特 (talk) 16:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

No you haven't because you are not competent in English. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at I Am a Singer (season 3). The Banner talk 19:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

But you also should not remove the useful information. When you add the templates, you should not remove the useful information.特克斯特 (talk) 04:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

I have now filed a case against you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:特克斯特. As you can read in the filing, it has something to do with a possible Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and with a lack of proper understanding of the English language and the rules and regulation of the English language Wikipedia (Wikipedia:Competence is required).

As you continue with your campaign, you have left my no other choice than asking the community to protect the encyclopaedia against you and your editing. The Banner talk 10:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:I Am a Singer (season 1) Final Round.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:I Am a Singer (season 1) Final Round.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 11:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

I have been blocked, I can't edit for the picture.特克斯特 (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

For your information: I have filed a case about you at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Singer 2018. I hope you want to participate to resolve the issues. The Banner talk 16:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

I think that the problem is you don’t know how the show is working. First, about the audience, everyone can sign up. Each show has 500 audiences. I don’t know this trivial why do you need a sources, this must related to you don’t know the show is not the fact of the show. And from I am A Singer S2 in breakout, the numbers of votes of Jason Zhang you can see that how many audiences in each episode, you seems that you don’t the show clearly is not about the fact. The problem now is solving is your concepts about the show. And the involvement me, although the results didn’t broadcast on the TV, however the participators of the show told us through Weibo. And they have told since 2013, so their sources are reliable.特克斯特 (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

I suggest that you look up what an audience is... The Banner talk 19:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Each audience is selected by the program.特克斯特 (talk) 10:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

I suggest that you look up what an audience is... The Banner talk 12:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Each audience is selected by the program.特克斯特 (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

You fail to understand. We don't care what you know about it. We need you to show us a newspaper or magazine article that explains the audience specifically. Without verifiability, those facts cannot be included. You'll likely be blocked for your refusal to cooperate. Chris Troutman (talk) 10:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources:sources 特克斯特 (talk) 15:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

That's not a reliable source, that's a blog post. If you cannot understand the concept of reliable source in neither English nor Chinese Wikipedia, then that's a problem that cannot be solved. Alex Shih^Talk 16:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

@Alex Shih: Is this a reliable sources? http://yule.sohu.com/20170113/n478635169.shtml In second paragraph, 500位大众听审团 have stated that.特克斯特 (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Better, but it's misinterpretation of the source. These 500 people are "live audiences" with the ability to vote for their favorite singers according to the source, they are not "judges". Alex Shih^Talk 16:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

That means this show has no judges? Each eapisode, there are 500 people are live audiences.特克斯特 (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Singer 2018. bonadea contributions talk 14:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Shih^Talk 15:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

If language is a problem, feel free to communicate with me in Chinese. But you need to stop with persistent addition of poorly sourced content, WP:CRYSTAL and other problematic editing behaviors, as many of them are not compatible with the standards of English Wikipedia. Alex Shih^Talk 14:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

@Alex Shih:

@Alex Shih: I will have a better communication with them, but the blocks still is indefinitely period?特克斯特 (talk) 03:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

特克斯特 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why do you block you in a Indefinite period? I have given you the sources clearly. The sources have stated how the 500 public audiences com from. 算了，我還是用中文吧'。在https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%E7%89%B9%E5%85%8B%E6%96%AF%E7%89%B9#Singer_2018_2 討論裏我給了來源去說明500位大眾聽審的來源，怎樣報名，如何組成500位聽審的。然後在https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%E7%89%B9%E5%85%8B%E6%96%AF%E7%89%B9#Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest.2FNoticeboard，這個討論我也再一次的給了另外一個來源也證明了500位大眾聽審的來源、如何報名。假如如果因為沒有給來源就封禁我無限期問題還是沒有解決，這次的問題是我們沒有溝通好吧，所以請求管理員縮短或解除封禁讓我們去溝通好，把條目做好吧。'

Decline reason:

I'm sorry; possibly this is some language issue, but competence is required to edit Wikipedia. I do not think your command of English is sufficient to improve the English Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Note for reviewers: the first source was some kind of FAQ, and the second source was a blog post. The latest source was slightly better, but misrepresents the content. This is a rather severe case of WP:CIR, as the user is incapable of understanding the very meaning of "judge" and "audience" in both English and even in Chinese. Please see the AN/I discussion above for more context. In conclusion, I do not recommend this block to be lifted at this time. Alex Shih^Talk 16:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
• Even this unblock request shows complete incompetence. I won't deny the unblock request since I've had to deal with this editor before, but I am perfectly in agreement with Alex Shih, whom I want to thank for their actions. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
• @Huon:But the time still is in indefinitely period, would you mind to reduce the period? I will have a better communication.特克斯特 (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I think that you have to address your language problem first. The Banner talk 08:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

"Indefinite" is not "infinite". You are welcome to request another review of your block when you are better able to communicate in English. Huon (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Singer 2018

Instead of hiding behind an "inuse-template" and editwarring, it would be much better when you give sources. Independent, reliable sources conform WP:RS.

Are you in any way related to this event? The Banner talk 07:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

The show of the judges are 500 public audiences, this is no need the sources. The show have said it since 2013.特克斯特 (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Can you answer my question about your involvement/relation to the show?

And is a case of proper decency to give sources when asked for. The Banner talk 18:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

You can see the page (Singer 2017).特克斯特 (talk) 02:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I can see the same promo and unsourced statements. Please, can you tell me how you are related to the show? The Banner talk 07:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

The audience must be 500 punlic audience. This kind of things need not the reliable sources, each season each episode is the same. You haven’t seen the program?特克斯特 (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, it does need a source. It is common decency to give sources when requested. And you still have not answered my question about your involvement in the program. The Banner talk 17:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

https://read01.com/zh-hk/AGgJaN.html#.WeLw7eR-WEc

Here is the sources.特克斯特 (talk) 05:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

That "source" states something else than the articles. The Banner talk 15:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

You seems that haven't read the sources carefully. The sources have stated the number of audiences.特克斯特 (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

If you stand by it, you need a better translator. At this moment the source does not state "500 audiences". The Banner talk 16:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

But I have been block for a indefinite period, although I have a better translator, you and the administrator will consider to give a chance for me to edit?特克斯特 (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

The block is handed out because you lack the skills to write proper English. You should work on your skills first. Things like Google Translate are helpful for a rough translation, but they lack the quality to write proper texts or even to understand a text. Only a human being can proper translate, so again: work on your skills. The Banner talk 12:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC) And I am not an administrator

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:I Am a Singer (season 1).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:I Am a Singer (season 1).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

@Stefan2:But I have been block for a indefinite period, how can I edit?特克斯特 (talk) 11:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

If you have been blocked indefinitely, then it can't be fixed by you, only by others. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

@Stefan2: Here are the sources.特克斯特 (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I Am a Singer (season 4)

@The Banner:I have seen you edit. The show broadcast on Friday, you also think that it isn't not a fact? And I saw some you put beside the name of the composer etc. This is the name, you seems that don't know about it, I really don't know what is happening. This edit is a destructive edit. You have delete the order of performance, this is the important thing of the show and in this episode the host is He Jiong why do you delete it? This seems that not the problem of fancruft. And why do you delete the arranger? Please think about what you are doing. 特克斯特 (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I have removed irrelevant and unsourced fancruft. The Banner talk 22:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Oh my god, seems a good “reason”, But I am still blocking by Alex Shih, otherwise I would give the sources to hit your face. 特克斯特 (talk) 08:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Start to learn English first...

Please be aware that talk page access for blocked users is in fact only for discussing your block. Not for discussing articles or slapping personal attacks. If you go on this way, this access - that is courtesy access, can be revoked. The Banner talk 17:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I have turned off talk page access based on these comments. Next unblock request would need to go through Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. Alex Shih (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Block evasion

Welcome back, User:特克斯特. Unfortunately, this block evasion with IP 182.239.89.193 will not work and will ruin your chances to get your account back to life. You should have known that your sloppy edits would be noticed straight away. Bye. The Banner talk 16:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)