User talk:༆

Hi, ༆, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a translation of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything.

Second anglo afghan war

The British wanted to colonize Afghanistan to have control in Central asia and South asia they didn't succeed in conquer the country on the other half Afghans also didn't because British had won lot of battles non of the parties won. if you want to undo this also then you should put a trustable/proffesional reference link

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feysalafghan (talk • contribs) 19:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Username query

What on earth is your username? All I can see is " ". Are you a blank space or a tab? Do I need a specific language installed to see you username?
Regards, 220 of ^Borg 05:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's this. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 05:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. ༆ (talk) 05:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Dr. K and '༆', the 'Yig mgo' character. How am I supposed to type that in on an 'English' keyboard? :-0 220 of ^Borg 10:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A keyboard-free solution is copying and pasting the character. At worst we can spell it out by its English term. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 22:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right

Sorry but i researched about the war and you were right it was a stragetic victory of the british. But there a group of indians who are changing afghani history at wikipedia with no references and sources, and i don't like that. that's why i was mad, they wanted to make me mad.

but sorry again. Feysalafghan (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 17th parallel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Masssly. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Religion in Vietnam. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. I am specifically referring to your edit summary here. Thank you. —Sadat (Masssly)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Religion in Morocco, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Sadat (Masssly)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dương Dynasty (An Nam)

Thanks for the message. This looks to me like a Chinese-perspective fork from Third Chinese domination of Vietnam however, I think you should raise it at the WikiProject Vietnam noticeboard to get wider input. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you move the template back to the agreed name for the article of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant as the name you are using was rejected for the article. Thanks. Here is the diff I'd appreciate you self reverting https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AHistory_of_the_Islamic_State_%28caliphate%29&diff=630615480&oldid=630615458 Legacypac (talk) 09:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Vietnam

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:History of Vietnam. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LeHappiste and the Tonkin Campaign

This user continued his edit warring, this time using 86.211.180.157, so I've blocked the named account indefinitely and the IP for two weeks. Favonian (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More1001

Hello. I just wanted to inform you that editor More1001 appears to be continuing with his removing of referenced, stable content and adding unreferenced data to the articles about Afghan history, as well as to other articles on Wikipedia (as his user contribution shows - [1]). I informed him it would be really appreciated if he stop with such behavior, but I don't know whether he'll listen to that. --Sundostund (talk) 14:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know what you mean. Unfortunately, we have many people on this project who, guided by their nationalistic views, are trying to wage a "crusade" in order to push in their POV edits... Its plain stupid, and essentially waste of (their) time. The Afghans defeated the British in all 3 wars? Yeah, right. As you said, They won some RANDOM battles, not the war as a whole. Anyway, just look at his user contribution if he starts all over again. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

from Pbfreespace3

Thanks for reverting Syrian Observer's edits, which were obviously unjustified. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for those. Pbfreespace3, you're close to earning one too. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright NeilN. I will follow the rules and not edit war. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 23:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vietnamese people in Cyprus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-Warring on First Anglo-Afghan War

Your recent editing history at First Anglo-Afghan War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Xtremedood (talk) 09:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Your addition to Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–July 2015) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ༆. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:History of Vatican City

Template:History of Vatican City has been nominated for merging with Template:Vatican City sidebar. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:History of the Americas templates

A tag has been placed on Template:History of the Americas templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 20:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Afghan atheists

A tag has been placed on Category:Afghan atheists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]