User talk:लाल सिंह चड्डा

June 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amit Bhadana, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please stop asking. I told you on TWO talk pages. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 19:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Kumar Dwivedi

If you legitimately think the Vinod Kumar Dwivedi article should be deleted, you should go through the Articles for Deletion process, but you will need to demonstrate per our notability guidelines that the subject doesn't qualify as notable. Make sure you perform due diligence per the guidelines at WP:BEFORE. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, लाल सिंह चड्डा! Thank you for your contributions. I am Prahlad balaji and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this.

If you want to change your username, go to Wikipedia:Changing username don't just move your user page. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 14:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tara Patkar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tara Patkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at WP:Articles for deletion/Tara Patkar. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nitin Patkar (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nitin Patkar (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon 10:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Junk sources

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Nitin Patkar (singer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 13:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nitinpatkar194 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing administrators reviewing any unblock request can email me for evidence, as I took into account more than just the evidence presented in the SPI report. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my user account user:लाल सिंह चड्डा.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

लाल सिंह चड्डा (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir why my Wikipedia account user:लाल सिंह चड्डा blocked. I am different of user:Nitinpatkar194, and user:लाल सिंह चड्डा is my first account on wikipedia. So please unblock me please.

Decline reason:

You need to address the findings of sockpuppetry. Simple denial is insufficient. Yamla (talk) 11:32, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock my user account user:लाल सिंह चड्डा.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

लाल सिंह चड्डा (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir why my Wikipedia account user:लाल सिंह चड्डा blocked. I am different of user:Nitinpatkar194, and user:लाल सिंह चड्डा is my first account on wikipedia. So please unblock me please. Because this is my second hand phone so please unblock me. लाल सिंह चड्डा (talk) 11:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasons for the finding of sockpuppetry. Until you choose to be more forthcoming, there are no grounds to lift the block, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The evidence I found is only related to comparing your edits and the edits of other accounts blocked as sockpuppets of Nitinpatkar194. Simply saying that you are using a second hand phone does not address these concerns. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I am new user so I don't know about some edits blocked by Wikipedia. So I say sorry and please unblock my wikipedia user account. लाल सिंह चड्डा (talk) 07:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
लाल सिंह चड्डा, the appeals process is best left to a uninvolved administrator, so they will decide about unblocking. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

Administrator note I see that 331dot declined. I was going to decline with the following explanation: It would be a fairly big coincidence that you created an article on Nitin Patkar (singer), but you are denying to be Nitinpatkar194, someone who also created an article about the same non-notable person. As I look through the history of articles written about this person, most of them look like vanity articles, i.e. some kid, maybe 17/18 trying to scam his way into Wikipedia. Sometimes he's indicated as a Kabbadi player, sometimes, an actor, sometimes a YouTuber, sometimes a musician. It looks to me like even he doesn't know what he is. So if he doesn't even know who he is, then how could you know who he is? His most popular song has fewer than 150 hits on YouTube, and largely sounds like random samples being laid on top of each other in the DAW. Sorry, I just don't believe that your "second hand phone" would be responsible for the extraordinary coincidence of creating an article on a non-notable kid. Find something better to do than spamming vanity articles at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]