User talk:आभीरवाटक

Welcome!

Hi आभीरवाटक! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! RegentsPark (comment) 18:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi आभीरवाटक! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 18:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abhira

Please note that disambiguation pages like Abhira are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 12:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaitugi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abhira. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalachuri dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abhira.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gwalvanshi Ahir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Raj era sources are considered as unreliable and are not accepted in caste articles as per community consensus! Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 08:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gwalvanshi Ahir, you may be blocked from editing. Persistent addition of Raj era or even prior sources is not acceptable in contentious caste articles. You can only cite modern scholarly work by reliable authors. Ekdalian (talk) 16:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ekdalian fine आभीरवाटक (talk) 16:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, आभीरवाटक! Ekdalian (talk) 16:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gwalvanshi Ahir. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 08:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gwalvanshi Ahir, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 11:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are talking bs, every source i added that day wasn't unsourced or poorly sourced. each of them were written after Raj Era. please allow me to edit them properly. and incase if the sources again are poor, kindly tell what type of sources can i use. Thanking You आभीरवाटक (talk) 00:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I have mentioned earlier. Anyway, you need to cite modern scholarly work by reliable authors. Moreover, discuss the proposed changes in the article talk page and achieve consensus first; this would be the best approach for such contentious caste articles. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 08:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review my current edit on Gwalvanshi Ahir page, kindly respond if the sources are unrealiable. Thanks आभीरवाटक (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned clearly in my edit summaries! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 10:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dhiraj Singh (Khichi) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dhiraj Singh (Khichi), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dhiraj Singh (Khichi) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dhiraj Singh (Khichi). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

stop making stupid edits And first learn about Wikipedia and then start editing here otherwise you may be blocked soon. 2409:4085:9E88:4BED:0:0:8889:4814 (talk) 21:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abhiras of Bhambhagiri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abhiras of Bhambhagiri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid using Raj era sources on caste articles. They are unreliable , see WP:RAJ, government published gazetteers aren't reliable either. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 09:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahir rebellion in Raghogarh moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ahir rebellion in Raghogarh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dauwa Ahir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dauwa Ahir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dauwa Ahir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 10:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gwalvanshi Ahir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir please see the edit log I am just trying to save it from recent vandalization by Penicalformation please allow me to change it. Thanks आभीरवाटक (talk) 08:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the high level "only warning" given above was inappropriate. The editor that issued it has been warned. —Small jim 11:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi आभीरवाटक! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. —Small jim 11:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim can you please stop the other guy he is initiating all this आभीरवाटक (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have just blocked User:Penicalformation for 48 hours for edit warring and have undone their latest edits. If they return, though, you must not continue to just revert their edits - please read WP:Dispute resolution and take action based on the guidance there. —Small jim 11:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly look into this matter. Anyone is again vandalizing Gwalvanshi Ahir page. आभीरवाटक (talk) 02:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Small jim 10:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim Sir please recheck the pages of Gwalvanshi Ahir & ग्वालवंशी someone is trying to vandalize it, I am just saving it. Kindly, look into this matter as soon as possible. Thanks आभीरवाटक (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I told you on 24 May what actions you should be taking, but you have just continued to revert the other editors changes. This cannot continue. Take the next 24 hours to review the guidance set out in the links provided above and then take appropriate action to help resolve the dispute. —Small jim 10:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim Can't you see the edit log of the page? That guys is constantly adding fake info/references from that day only. I am just trying to save this wiki page. Please resolve this issue. I would be grateful of you. आभीरवाटक (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+ He's on Simple Wikipedia too आभीरवाटक (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All that any editor without specialised knowledge in this area will see is a long series of reverts from one version of the article to another, with neither being clear vandalism. You need to clearly explain, in some detail, on the article's talk page what is wrong with the other editors changes. After doing that, if the other editor(s) do not engage with you to achieve consensus, you will then have a good basis for seeking dispute resolution. As I said, you can profitably use the period of your block to work out a strategy. Make sure you re-read the "Introduction to contentious topics" that was posted on this page on 14 May, too. —Small jim 10:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim i'm looking forward to do it, can you protect/lock the Gwalavanshi Ahir page? If you do so I would be very grateful of you. Thanking you आभीरवाटक (talk) 11:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

typo Gwalvanshi Ahir आभीरवाटक (talk) 12:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I won't do that because there is no clear evidence that your preferred version is the better one. —Small jim 12:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim how can I prove it? आभीरवाटक (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have told you above what you need to do. —Small jim 12:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim Thank you, I will do it as soon as possible. आभीरवाटक (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahir

Now you can contribute to improving the Ahir article, but you have to keep in mind that when you make changes in the Ahir article, your contributions should be constructive and should be based on reliable sources as well as anything in the article. Thank you. 2409:4085:9C1C:971:0:0:8109:E014 (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/आभीरवाटक. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 02:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dhiraj Singh (Khichi)

Hello, आभीरवाटक. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhiraj Singh (Khichi), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abhiras of Bhambhagiri

Hello, आभीरवाटक. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abhiras of Bhambhagiri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]