User talk:Prince Deckow Sr.

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Hamish Ross (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Your recent reversion of Paula Johnson

Can you tell me the reasoning behind your recent reversion of Paula Johnson? My original edit was performed per Template:Wellesley College presidents to be consistent with other Wellesley presidents, such as H. Kim Bottomly and Diana Chapman Walsh. I would be most interested in hearing the reason why you believe that my original edit was not constructive. 96.69.249.93 (talk) 09:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Small jim 09:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does it look vandalising to you?

[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6B67:E700:800:ED04:DC2E:DB60:A86F (talk) 17:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does, and frankly your attitude stinks. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's only one person whose attitude stinks, and it's yours.

We all look forward to your inevitable dismissal from the platform, and good riddance. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this up and you'll be given a well deserved and extremely lengthy ban. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ADMINISTRATORS: Please step in and ban this destructive troll. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admins, please take time to read the abusive messages left by the anon above. They are in need of a lengthy block. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incompetent

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:94.255.152.53&oldid=1252080427#October_2024 94.255.152.53 (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speak for yourself! Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024 (updated warning)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop harassing other editors by posting final warnings that are completely without justification. And stop marking all of your edits as WP:MINOR. _signed,Willondon (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - this person is a MENACE and needs to be banned. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps if you didn't vandalise articles in the first place, you wouldn't find yourself getting warned. I suggest you cease your unwanted behaviours at once! Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am vandalising NOTHING - I am updating results as they happen. You are harassing genuine users of this platform and you should be ashamed of yourself. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He also reverted my reversion of vandalism at Eva Elfie page and placed a warning on my page as if I was a vandal. Time to report to administration? 2A02:2455:1821:EA00:77CA:21EE:CC2E:F0AE (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. He's a menace and requires immediate banning. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just double checked the edits you made which were reverted. I don't know how you sleep at night knowing that you've come here to trash articles and help spread misinformation. Leave at once! Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get some administrator to dismiss this fool, please? It's just a troll with no life, but a very destructive one. Please ban him so he can start to think about his life and perhaps make some changes. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for continuing to show to the world the kind of person you are...hostile and unable to accept you are wrong. I would tell you to put down your shovel and stop digging, but it suits me just find if you want to accelerate your impending block for vandalising articles. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your impending dismissal is assured. When you go to bed tonight, doubtless alone, have a word with yourself and commit to being a better person tomorrow. 51.7.3.88 (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

Don't feed the troll guys. Already reported. Knitsey (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll stop engaging with that abusive IP as you suggest. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of my revert

Recently you reverted my reversion of obvious vandalism at Eva Elfie, as her name is Юля (Yulia), not Петр (Petr). Even worse than that, you placed a warning on my page as if my revert was an awful vandalism itself. I don't know if it was by mistake or on purpose, but it is definitely against WP:FAITH. I'm reverting your revert. If you continue your disruption, I'll make a report to admins. 2A02:2455:1821:EA00:77CA:21EE:CC2E:F0AE (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not "obvious" vandalism at all, and you were wrong to revert. Don't get involved. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

How are the edits vandalism? I was adding the link for List of United States federal judges by longevity of service for people who are on that list. 98.228.137.44 (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through them and personally I was quite shocked by what I saw. Don't you dare make unconstructive edits like that again. Prince Deckow Sr. (talk) 18:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is linking to a related article unconstructive? 98.228.137.44 (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

@Prince Deckow Sr.: can you clarify how these edits at Pulse nightclub shooting would warrant this serious warning you gave for vandalism at User talk:2804:14C:7583:47EC:5457:DD3A:A842:5878#October 2024? Best, Bridget (talk) 18:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. There are levels of warnings for a reason. Not every vandalism edit requires an immediate 4im warning. GSK (talk • edits) 18:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account posts false warnings about vandalism.

I made a valid edit, and this account told me it was vandalism. 24.47.179.32 (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The account seems to be blocked now Dosinovsky (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]