User talk:غياث العرودكي

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of GhiathArodaki (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Welcome!

Hello, PrinceGhiath, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Crooked Man (video game), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JustBerry (talk) 22:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Crooked Man (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Crooked Man (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JustBerry (talk) 22:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, غياث العرودكي. You have new messages at The Crooked Man (video game)'s talk page.
Message added 23:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I have replied to your CSD contest. JustBerry (talk) 23:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

غياث العرودكي (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JaberEl-Hour". The reason given for JaberEl-Hour's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".

Blocking administrator: KrakatoaKatie (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: It looks like you are related to JaberEl-Hour (talk · contribs) and in any case, none of your edits have been productive, so there's no reason to lift the block at this time. Yamla (talk) 12:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla This is so unfair to say that my edits weren't productive.I suggest go to my contributions and see for yourself. I have no idea who is this user. Probably he shares my IP. I looked at his IP and he seems to stand with the opposition and I am a Pro-Assad. Plus I am not even related to politics at all.غياث العرودكي 23:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of your edits to articles, six were to articles which were deleted. One was to an article which was not deleted, but your edit was subsequently removed. How do you claim your contributions are productive? --Yamla (talk) 22:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla Only two articles were deleted which is the Crooked Man video game article and Ikhlas Private School. I have created two Articles and I edited another. Tell me were did you find those other four? or you are just slandering?. You are convicting me of vandalizing and not participating in the wiki, which is unacceptable. غياث العرودكي 03:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your list of contributions is available at Special:Contributions/غياث_العرودكي. It shows exactly one contribution to an article and if you check that article, you can see your contribution was subsequently removed. The other six contributions are available at Special:DeletedContributions/غياث_العرودكي (though it may require admin privileges to see). You can see that all of these contributions were subsequently deleted. Indeed, that's the whole point of the DeletedContributions page. This includes the two articles you created which, as previously mentioned, were subsequently deleted. --Yamla (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla I agree with you, but only two articles were created. The other thing is you are trying to convict me of vandalizing and not participating positively. I did those edits as a productive edits for Wikipedia, they are significant but I needed to find sources. That doesn't mean I vandalize and I am here to mess around. That's unacceptable to say. غياث العرودكي 22:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

غياث العرودكي (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I was blocked without any proof or notice of any behavior that violates Wikipedia's policy. غياث العرودكي 23:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Considering that your arabic name appears to be a transliteration of GhiathArodaki, you'll need to convince us you have no relationship with that blocked user. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:35, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is obvious that we are not. He is shown to be a guy who lives in the Arab world and came to wikipedia to vandalize. I didn't do anything wrong since the first day I signed on to Wikipedia and I do not live in the Arab World, we have different IP too.غياث العرودكي 01:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

غياث العرودكي (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stated the reason already. I did nothing wrong, I didn't vandalize since I came here. If I did anything wrong, you can warn me about it. غياث العرودكي 02:11, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"We have different IP too" would be far more convincing this account hadn't been affected by an autoblock caused by the block of a GhiathArodaki sockpuppet. Huon (talk) 20:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For god sake, this is not a sockpuppet, I did nothing wrong. This is unacceptable. At least block me for a week or so. This is so ridiculous.غياث العرودكي 02:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)\

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

غياث العرودكي (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocking me for no reason, again, I am not a sockpuppet, I did nothing wrong. Treating the users like this is unacceptable. I am here participating positively. I didn't vandalize once. Please, be respectful, collaborative, and unblock me. غياث العرودكي 4:17 am, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

You have the same IP address as GhiathArodaki and your username means Ghiath Arodaki is Arabic. Yet, you fail to explain how is that possible that you are not GhiathArodaki. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't have the same IP.غياث العرودكي 16:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

غياث العرودكي (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So this is how you treat your users?, I did nothing wrong. I can't be blocked for something I didn't do. Yes there are many people in Syria with name Ghiath and there are more than one family named Arodaki. We can have a compromise, why don't you unblock me and see my behavior. My behavior was good before you even blocked me, but if you want to be thick heads, let us solve it this way. غياث العرودكي 17:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:DUCK sockpuppetry (بطة) OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Due to WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, I have revoked access to this user's talk page. Enough is enough. However, I will leave the unblock request for another admin to review. --Yamla (talk) 17:36, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]