User talk:عُثمان/Archive 2023-10-07
Hi, I came across this category recently. I'll note that per WP:BUSOUTCOMES, individual articles for bus routes are not retained, but instead a list article should be used. I've already merged a few articles, but thought I'd reach out to you since you've been gnoming in here lately. Are there any bus routes here that have individual notability, or would you agree that a list article sufficiently covers everything? 162 etc. (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nearly all of them should have individual articles with only a few exceptions (those being the ones numbered 15, 29, and 44 under the pre-2017 numbering scheme). The rest of them were planned based on streetcar routes and have a long storied history going back to the 20th century. There are a number of reputable sources in print and online to reference for each. If there is any additional information you would want to know to retain these articles, let me know.
- I'm not sure if it helps to point this out, but Baltimore is different from most American cities in that a very large proportion of the population does not drive. The amount of influence each of these routes have on the city in general is a lot greater than most cities; and other public transport cities do tend to have individual route articles (New York, London, and Washington, DC all do - and Washington, DC was a smaller city than Baltimore until relatively recently if size is also a factor).
- It also seems like it would be a big discrepancy to make such sweeping changes to bus route articles, but retain most individual articles for highway routes and automobile models, most of which have a shorter history and less relevance to other topics than any of the bus routes in Baltimore. For example Ford F-Series is a separate article for a specific series of Ford cars, and then further each generation of the series has its own separate article. U.S. Route 1 in Maryland has its own article despite "US Route 1" being unsigned for large stretches in Maryland. Most Baltimore residents would be able to tell you that the Gold route (formerly the 13) is the bus route that runs on North Avenue, but the fact that North Avenue is technically a part of a US highway is not common knowledge and definitely not meaningful information to most people. I would say fair enough if as serious of an effort is being made to merge these articles into one article each, but if not, I think it's reasonable to keep the bus route ones. They are certainly more notable than highway routes considering the Maryland State Highway Administration doesn't even include Baltimore within its jurisdiction. --Middle river exports (talk) 23:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- I did just notice that the routes you changed to redirects are all commuter and express bus routes. Those are not really Baltimore city bus routes and there is less to say about them; those specifically would be perfectly fine to group together in a list.
- I'll draft a list of which specific articles can be merged out of the ones in this category in my userspace and share it to clarify things. With some of the older local bus routes (lower than 100 designations; commuter/express is greater than 100), they should be merged into the specific article of another route rather than a list, so it is not obvious at the moment. For example, the content of Route 7 (MTA Maryland) belongs with CityLink Lime (BaltimoreLink) as that is a deprecated route which duplicated service on the Pennsylvania Avenue corridor. --Middle river exports (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Right. It does appear that many of these are well-written articles, and it's not my intention to undo all the work that went into writing them "just because". Routes with demonstrated notability in secondary sources should stay. However, any articles that basically boil down to "This is Route X, and this is where it goes" should instead redirect to a list article. Thanks! 162 etc. (talk) 16:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Yes, that makes sense. I'm not sure how long it will take to bring the most relevant ones up to date, so I've been focusing on LocalLink 80 (BaltimoreLink) for the time being as its been flagged. I can probably start working to merge the articles which can be merged to a list or other article ahead of time too. --Middle river exports (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Bhariati
- added links pointing to Dravidian, Hindustani, Indo-Aryan and SIL
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Call for presentations for WCNA 2022 and Mapping USA
[edit] |
Call for presentations for WikiConference North America 2022 and OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA
This is a call for presentations by EOD, Sunday, October 15, for WikiConference North America (Nov 11-13), held jointly with OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA. We encourage you to please submit your Wikipedia and Wikimedia proposals at Wikiconference:2022/Submissions or OpenStreetMap US proposals at Call for Proposals: WikiConference North America + Mapping USA. We are sending this mass message to you because we deduced that you may be in North America and interested in maps in Wikimedia or Wikipedia, OpenStreetMap, or OpenHistoricalMaps. We are looking for lightning talks in particular on Friday, Nov 11. Some suggestions:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
 |
Registration is open for WCNA 2022 and Mapping USA
[edit] |
WikiConference North America 2022 will be virtual, November 11-13. We will hold it jointly with OpenStreetMap US's Mapping USA. Our theme this year is open knowledge allies.
Registration is now open here! Please register by the 10th so that we can set everyone up online on our platform. Like last year, we are planning on using Hopin. Our schedule is will be finalized and available in the next few days. We have an exciting line-up of sessions related to Wikimedia, OpenStreetMap, and the intersection of the two. Stay tuned! Local meet-ups will occur in Indianapolis and New York City - if you are available and interested in attending either of these, you can find more details here. If you want to connect with other participants or have questions, please join our Telegram channel here. |
|
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Pakistan Star | |
| Dear عُثمان, thank you for your contributions to WikiProject Pakistan, especially your edits to the Shahmukhi article. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 22:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you! I feel like I have not done that much but I appreciate it. عُثمان (talk) 22:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Subject–object–verb word order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copula. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
"Phulrraa" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Phulrraa has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 6 § Phulrraa until a consensus is reached. Onel5969 TT me 18:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Temporal clause
[edit] Hello, عُثمان. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Temporal clause, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Temporal clause
[edit]
Hello, عُثمان. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Temporal clause".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)