User talk:عمر خالد 8888

Welcome!

Hello, عمر خالد 8888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 16:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hi Begoon, I am عمر خالد 8888, I am truly sorry when I have edited tow articles and made some mistakes during the editing. However, I didn't mean to vandalize the articles and all I want to do is removing some misinformation and some bias information. I am a new member of Wikipedia community, and I am looking forward to be an active member in this community.r — Preceding unsigned comment added by عمر خالد 8888 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ok, but you're not being entirely honest, are you? What you've been trying to do is to slant the articles towards the point of view you'd like them to show. I can certainly understand the temptation to do that, but you probably ought to read: WP:RGW. If you carry on editing like that you're going to get yourself blocked.

My suggestion is that when you want to make substantial changes like that you go to the article talk page(s) first and discuss what you want to alter, to reach a consensus with other editors. That's how things work here, not with everyone wildly changing back and forth to what they each think is unbiased. Discuss your edits on talk pages before you make them, and only make them when everyone agrees, and everything should be fine. -- Begoon 02:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi begoon, thank you for your advice about using talk pages. But I was very honest when I tried to remove bias information and other misinformation, for example, I didn't remove any sourced parts even if I was against my personal views. What about putting new information with sources without going to talk pages. Is it OK. عمر خالد 8888 (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, given the fact that you do seem rather keen to portray one particular viewpoint, and the edits could be seen as controversial, I'd still highly recommend using the talk pages, at least at first, until you get a feel for how things work. After all, you did say you want to "be an active member in this community", and there's no better way of doing that than taking part in some discussions. You'll probably find that other editors have valuable and helpful advice and input.

Of course, there's nothing to force you to follow my advice, and you can proceed as you see fit - I'm just trying to avoid the situation where you get in more trouble by editing in what some others might see as a too aggressive or one-sided manner. -- Begoon 06:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Begoon, thank you very much for your advice, and I will do my best not to get myself in troubles. عمر خالد 8888 (talk) 11:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well as I say, if you take things slowly, discuss your edits before making them, and stick to reliable sources and a neutral point of view, everything should be fine. Good luck. -- Begoon 11:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Begoon, I am wondering why you have reverted my edit in Yemeni Air Force. Despite it was accepted by another user called User:I dream of horses. Please answer me. عمر خالد 8888 (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where your edit was "accepted" by anybody. It was reverted by two different editors: [1], [2]. I've since made a small edit to the article to remove some non-neutral language from the lead. Regardless of that, the place to discuss that edit, as I've already indicated to you, would be: Talk:Yemeni Air Force.

Also, please be aware that, while you are fully entitled to remove warnings from your talk page, this is taken as confirmation that you have read and acknowledged them. Removing the warnings does not "hide" them as they are easily reviewable in the revision history of this page. Thank you. -- Begoon 01:43, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/عمر خالد 8888, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SharabSalam (talk) 10:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/عمر خالد 8888. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

عمر خالد 8888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have any Sockpuppet

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed, there's no doubt. Yamla (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

عمر خالد 8888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have any Sockpuppet, and if I have please show me any evidence

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The evidence is available at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/عمر خالد 8888. --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

عمر خالد 8888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fell very sorry for lying about the other user. In fact, he was my brother, and I asked him to make the user (King David1999). I want to make a fresh beginning. عمر خالد 8888 (talk) 10:12 am, 21 August 2020, Friday (23 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

What you engaged in then is meatpuppetry. I'm not sure why we should believe you now. only (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

As you well know, the publicly viewable evidence is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/عمر خالد 8888. A checkuser has determined there is a connection between you and at least one other editor. Check users have access to private, personally confidential information that cannot be revealed without the permission of the user. As this is a checkuser block, only a checkuser may unblock you. For more information, please read the pertinent sections of the guide to appealing blocks. Thanks, -- Deep fried okra 13:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra, I think there is a mistake. I think the problem is a similar extension in my IP address with other user IP address. please, can you help me to solve this.

I don't know why you say something about a "similar extension" between your IP address and King David 1999's... That would imply that you know what their IP address is, thereby confirming that these accounts are in some way related to each other? That is weird because you said at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/عمر خالد 8888 I DID NOT KNOW the other user at all. ST47 (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, because I am from Saudi Arabia, and they said the other account is also Saudi.