User talk:سیمون دانکرک

November 2019

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maximinus Thrax, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 02:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was an error on my part, there was a source. My apologies. Ifnord (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus سیمون دانکرک (talk) 02:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited in 3rd paragraph of http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Ammian/28*.html سیمون دانکرک (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jade road

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jade road requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.unikaz.asia/en/content/great-jade-road. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{ ping| I have altered words . Please review more carefully. سیمون دانکرک (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jade road

Hello سیمون دانکرک,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jade road for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CatcherStorm ^talk 21:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jade road moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jade road, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC) @Justlettersandnumbers:It will be dealt with.سیمون دانکرک (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Proto-Indo-European homeland

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning: start using the talkpage instead of the revert-button. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. –Darkwind (talk) 07:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Proto-Indo-European homeland, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Third time; you've been warned, you've been blocked, yet you continue diff. @Darkwind: could you take a look here? Thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring partial block

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Proto-Indo-European homeland) for a period of 4 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. –Darkwind (talk) 19:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not express any judgement about whether the content you want to add to the article ought to be included. It is, however, quite clear that there is no consensus for the edits you are trying to make, but you keep trying to make them repeatedly. You need to stop adding controversial material to the article, and find some good-quality sources to back up what you are trying to add. The next four days will give you a good opportunity to do so. –Darkwind (talk) 19:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jade road

Hello, سیمون دانکرک. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jade road".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Request topic-ban for User:سیمون دانکرک/IP-range 2600:1700:1030:2070:* regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jade Road

Hello, سیمون دانکرک. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jade Road, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]