User talk:سیانف

Welcome!

Hello, سیانف, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acacia modesta

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Acacia modesta, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250063319.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Medical translation

We would love to have you join us. What languages do you wish to work in? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request for IP address

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

سیانف (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AsifYaqubi". The reason given for AsifYaqubi's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".

Blocking administrator: ‪Bbb23‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Done! Yamla (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you participate in an editthon recently?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yamla--سیانف (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My question above requires a response.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are you asking me Bbb23? I am not able to understand your question.--سیانف (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23! I made this article in a #wikigap event recently held in Pakistan with the help of Embassy of Sweden.--سیانف (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:EDITTHONs, often called edit-a-thons. What article do you mean?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is first time, I made a full length article (Ismat Shahjahan) on English Wikipedia, during #wikigap event to reduce the gender gap on internet.--سیانف (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Socialism

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for inviting me.--سیانف (talk) 10:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help

Hi,

I was looking for some small help. I created a new article en:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab to your language Urdu and Western Punjabi. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.

Thanking you , with warm regards Bookku (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for considering me for the task. I will try my best to do so.--سیانف (talk) 05:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:سیانف lot of thanks for accepting my request, I look forward to the translations of en:Kithaab in coming weeks. Please feel free to ask whenever you need help about the article.

Following is just for information.

Actually I do have little longer list of articles that needs expansion support but I do not want to over burden or overwhelm you with expectations, Following is the list I am not looking for immediate in long run let following topics too in back of your thought so whenever you come across suitable references you will be able to support those articles.

I have been supporting article expansions of Islamic literature, Islamic advice literature, Islamic feminism, Hermeneutics of feminism in Islam and some more.

I have been looking for peer review support of article Women in Islam @ review page Wikipedia:Peer review/Women in Islam/archive1

Above said review of article will help update and expansion of Draft:Women's rights in Muslim societies

Draft:Aurats (word) This article is supposed to be about historical linguistics of word 'Aurat'

(An article about Draft:Aurat about cultural women (with literary and cultural metaphors and idioms) also was started but since it lacked proactive editorial support got deleted. As and when some one works seriously on ur:عورت may be started again.

Draft:Feminism in Urdu literature which also needs expansion support.

So as discussed of now keenly awaiting translations of of en:Kithaab in coming weeks. You are supporting women rights related articles and It is very nice of you.

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I am taking part in #WikiGapPakistan which aims to improve the coverage of Pakistani women on Wikipedia (English and Urdu) organized by The Embassy of Sweden in Pakistan with the support of its partners; Digital Rights Foundation, Media Matters for Democracy, UN Women and Wikimedia Sweden.--سیانف (talk) 13:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gap is truly too big but I don't want to burden you with the whole list at one go, What you are doing is a very good begining on your part, best wishes and thanks. Bookku (talk) 16:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shirkat Gah

@ User:سیانف,

Greetings once again. Previously I had worked a little on Pakistani feminism related article Shirkat Gah, but since I could not sustain my focus on the same it got deleted. If you feel interested do add the same to your gap listing.

Just I remembered so thought to keep you informed. Thanks and regards Bookku (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One more request

Greetings once again,

First of all thanks for your contribution to the article Shirkat Gah.

There is some good effort on important topic by a new user got stuck due to copyright issues. It seems article needs to be built up again from scratch, but looking at importance of the subject for Woman in Pakistan, I wish article does not get deleted as far as possible.

Please do visit and expand Talk:Women related laws in Pakistan/Temp if you find topic interested in.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has some very specific rules regarding creation of any new articles. I, myself, is a new user on English Wikipedia and still in learning process and trying to imporove my mistakes every day. I will suggest, one must go through those rules and try to follow them. A page, written after following those rules, hardly see any deletion problem.--سیانف (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Being new you seem to have some misunderstanding. I have rewritten @ Talk:Women related laws in Pakistan/Temp following all the rules. If you and others join in it will certainly add value. Mistakes keep happening from new comers it's okay we need to collectively over come them. Bookku (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently participated in a campaign named "Wikigap" which is about reducing the gender gap on Wikidpedia. When I started the campaign, "Women related laws in Pakistan" was mentioned to be created in the list suggested by the reviewers. I wanted to make this article as my top priority but I knew, it needs extensive amount of reading, research and time to collect all the relavant and necessary information related to the topic. So I kept it pending. Without enough reading and infomration, it is difficult for me to work on any topic. I hope you understand. I know the topic you are asking me to work upon is very important one but I need time to read for this, myself first. I do not favour copyright violation in haste, in any article. Take time, write and rewrite before publishing to the Wikipedia.--سیانف (talk) 15:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Greetings once again, I am happy I could rewrite and rescue article Women related laws in Pakistan, and thanks you too have made some updates to it. I am also thankful to you for creating article Shirkat Gah.
As I earlier requested I would be looking for your help in getting women's rights related article Kithaab translated to Urdu language Wikipedia, if you find the article interesting.

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 06:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Let me try.--سیانف (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for consideration and warm regards Bookku (talk) 04:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Jonathan Deamer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Aurat March without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting of Aurat March article

Greetings,

It seems you want to split article Aurat March to Aurat Azadi March. But exactly it is not clear if that is what you want to do, Pl. do elaborate a little.

Bookku (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are two different marches organized by different groups that is why I tried to split.--سیانف (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks, I suppose if you add same explanation in Aurat March article as you have given in Aurat Azadi March and in edit summary that you are forking info to newly forked article then other editors will not get confused.

Warm regards Bookku (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some concerns

Greetings,

1)

Mandatory attribution: When we are copying from one Wikipedia article to another Wikipedia article, We are supposed to give an attribution to edit history of earlier article in the edit summary,(This is very important formality )

For example recently I did split article Black Sea and created new article Black Sea drainage basin and copy pasted content from various 'river' articles.

Every time I included following type of attribution in edit summary

Copy pasting from [[Black Sea]] ; Pl. see history of [[Black Sea]] for attributions.

Detail rules are mentioned @ Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia

One more example, when yesterday I copy pasted content to Draft:Love in Pakistan I gave attributions to various articles like "Copy pasting from [[Heer and Ranjha]] ; Pl. see history of [[Heer and Ranjha]] for attributions" (By the way, I would be happy if you can help expand Draft:Love in Pakistan)

So in your case edit summary attribution can be like ""Copy pasting from [[Aurat March]] ; Pl. see history of [[Aurat March]] for attributions"

Are you expected to give attribution to previous Copy pasted content I suppose yes, not doing so will unnecessarily give chance to some one who wants to delete content under pretext of rules.

2)

Content shifting

I do understand your good intentions of article splitting and content shifting From Aurat March to Aurat Azadi March; I do not know if at all you have read some recent discussion @ Talk:Aurat March

As of now most people are unaware of nuanced difference between Aurat March and Aurat Azadi March that is evident from page views. For example in last 20 days article Aurat March had average 1023 page views per day totaling up to 21,482 views; Where as article Aurat Azadi March had just 19 views per day totaling up to just 400 views in last 20 days.

A) Even those who are doing disinformation they are not necessarily doing disinformation of Aurat Azadi March but they would intend to do disinformation of all the progressive Aurat Marchers. B) When you shift content related to disinformation to Aurat Azadi March, most readers will not be reaching there and end of the day marching women continue to suffer from disinformation.

I am not against separate article for Aurat Azadi March or suitable content shifting, but what I would sincerely suggest is to keep/treat/maintain Aurat March as main article and continue to have a separate section related to Aurat Azadi March including small summary about disinformation part of it.

Requesting you to take above concerns in to account, when you get free please do help expand new article Draft:Love in Pakistan and Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies from my side for not being able to read and follow rules properly. I think you are right about the merger of the two articles and keeping a seperate section of Aurat Azadi March. The reason I shifted the misinformation part to the Aurat Azadi March because the legal smear campaigns were against Islamabad's organisers and participants of Aurat Azadi March.--سیانف (talk) 07:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC) For now, I moved back most of the material to Aurat March and tried to improve the Aurat Azadi March page. Have a look.--سیانف (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @ سیانف,

If you read my point 8 @ Talk:Aurat March & above discussion, I am not suggesting merger but continue having a separate small section of Aurat Azadi March in Aurat March and develop article Aurat Azadi March more on basis of those academic and news sources which are themselves properly aware and clear about difference between sources Aurat Azadi March and Aurat March because may be you and very few people will be clear about exact difference and which thing is about which march on those clear source continue to develop Aurat Azadi March.

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 10:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A new reference book

Greetings @ سیانف

I happened to come across following new reference book by Sarah Waheed focusing on leftist political history of Pakistan, seems interesting good read. Book preview is available on Google books and I suppose, might help you in your encyclopedic editing on Wikipedia for various details.

Waheed, Sarah Fatima. Hidden Histories of Pakistan: Censorship, Literature, and Secular Nationalism in Late Colonial India. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Happy editing

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggesting, I will read it.--سیانف (talk) 08:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taking new articles to the WP mainpage

Greetings @ سیانف

Just gone by March month was first time for me to suggest new article Women's World (Ottoman magazine) (in a way first feminist magazine in Muslim world) for 'Do you know section' on Wikipedia main page. The whole effort was helped out by other editors and it was an interesting experience.

When one writes new articles we need to apply for Main page Do you know process within seven days with some new interesting information from new article written by us.

I wish you also try since you write new articles with some new info first time for international audience.

Happy editing

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feminism and Folklore 2022 - Local prize winners

Please help translate to other languages.

Congratulations for winning a local prize in Feminism and Folklore 2022 writing competition. Thank you for your contribution and documenting your local folk culture on Wikipedia. Please fill in your preferences before 15th of June 2022 to receive your prize. Requesting you to fill this form before the deadline to avoid disappointments.

Feel free to contact us if you need any assistance or further queries.

Best wishes,

FNF 2022 International Team

Stay connected

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, سیانف. Thank you for creating Akhtar Hussain (lawyer). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 10:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. سیانف (talk) 07:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ammar Rashid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ammar Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gheus (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ammar Rashid has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ammar Rashid. Thanks! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]