User talk:سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Vaibhavafro. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Para (Special Forces), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Vaibhavafro ^💬 10:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Badgam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

INDICSCRIPTS

Please do not add any WP:INDICSCRIPTS names to WikiProject India articles. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Para (Special Forces), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Vaibhavafro ^💬 04:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Para (Special Forces). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Specifically, I am referring to these edits:[1][2]. — Vaibhavafro ^💬 04:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 15:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kargil War

In place of asking references for something which is already referenced, you need to read Kargil War#India discovers infiltration and mobilises. Both figures are sourced in the article body, infobox does not really require sources if article body has already explained the info with sources. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 15:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Your addition to Battle of Chamb has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

Don't copy paste content from other website to Wikipedia. You must use your own words for what you want to add here. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 15:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to re-write whole text but if you edit warred to restore copyright violation then you risk getting blocked. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 16:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have restored copyright violation again. You are supposed to completely rewrite the content in your own words. Aside this, why you are heavily depending on a single source? Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 08:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

You are marking almost all major edits of yours as 'minor', see WP:ME and avoid doing this. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 07:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 09:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning about copyvio

Please desist, or you will be sanctioned. There will be no further warning. If you're uncertain about what is or isn't copyvio, please query the article talk page first. El_C 14:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taer 2 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Taer 2, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taer 2 has been accepted

Taer 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tipu (missile) (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Barkeep49 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not skilled enough in urdu to filter out the results for Tipu Sultan and so I was unable to verify that this notable. Additional sources would make a difference - the sources here are the same and are not clearly WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tipu (missile) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tipu (missile), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Barkeep49 (talk) 23:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Barkeep49 (talk) 23:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamin-2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for copyrights violations. Please note that the next violation is likely to be met by an indefinite block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 19:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did some WP:PARAPHRASE on the pages of Project Azm and Battle of Chamb however those were only in secctions where it was necessary,I could have given attribution to the authors if asked and had discussed this matter at the talk page of battle of chamb, when it comes to Project Azm then the Paraphrased content had itself originated from the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex page in which it is somewhat necessary to paraphrase with attributionسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 02:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are no longer blocked, so I am declining this proceduarally. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Categorization of pages

I noticed that you've been adding more categories to articles about Iranian weapons. Some of the categories you've added are parent categories of one or more categories already on the page. Example here, you added Category:Surface-to-air missiles and Category:Guided missiles of Iran to the article, but one of the existing categories, Category:Surface-to-air missiles of Iran, is already in both of those categories, therefore the categories you added are redundant. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article Noor (Rocket)

I see you haves started a draft article on the Noor rocket This looks like the same device as the Noor (missile) which we already have an article for. Perhaps you could instead look at ways of improving the existing article? cheers IdreamofJeanie (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Noor rocket is an artillery rocket while the noor missile is an anti-ship cruise missile, you can do some research online there is a big difference between the two, they only have same nameسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 12:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Noor (rocket)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Noor (rocket) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

just a recreation of existing article Noor (missile

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 12:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noor (rocket)

I've rescued your draft from deletion here. I can't seem to find information on a "Noor" artillery rocket, my internet search only gave web pages about the Noor missile. Do you have an image of the Noor rocket that shows that it is indeed a separate weapon? - ZLEA _T\^C 14:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is discussed Here in second paragraph, line 8-10سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 19:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The range stated by the source conflicts with the known range of the other Noor. It's enough to convince me that there are two Noor missiles. I'll contest the speedy deletion with this information. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noor (artillery rocket) has been accepted

Noor (artillery rocket), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iran–Pakistan relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammad Bagheri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyrights violations, again. I will need some pretty strong assurances that you will adhere to Wikipedia's policy on copyrights if you are to be unblocked. You need to write your own original prose rather than rely on the prose written by others, and you need to demonstrate you understand this imperative.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 19:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did the edit on 3 June yet the consensus regarding it being a copy right violation was reached at 5 June 2020, at that time the consensus had not been reached and thus it was necessary to revert its removalسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 12:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm really, really concerned about your claim that the consensus wasn't reached until June 5. Copyright violations place the entire project in jeopardy and you need to be absolutely certain there's no copyright concern with your edits. If there's any doubt, any doubt at all, you need to not make the edit. It was inappropriate of you to make the edit on June 3rd, and you need to convince us you thoroughly understand this. If you provide satisfactory answers to the questions above, I'll discuss with the blocking administrator whether we can lift the block, but frankly your prior unblock request substantially counts against you. --Yamla (talk) 13:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will give the answers of all five questions plus explanation for the additional doubts raised. Copyright is a sort of intellectual property with which the owner has an exclusive right to reproduce, sell, modify and share a literary, musical or artistic work which is called a creative work. When it comes to Wikipedia's licencing wikipedia is licenced under the CC BY-SA 3.0 and the GFDL,the CC BY-SA 3.0 permits one to share the material as well as derive content from it even for commercial purposes as long as the content derived from the original has the same licence as the original and it gives credit to the original producer. The GFDL is a licence that grants copyleft rights similarly, works licenced with this can be used in any way as long as the previous author is provided attribution, the previous licence is maintained, changes must be recorded. Wikipedia having its database servers in the United States is subject to the copyright laws of the United States, nevertheless violation of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act can get the entire Wikimedia project in serious trouble, wikipedia itself intends to be a source of free content. Wikipedia uses copyrighted content only if it abides by Fair use and not closely paraphrased, wikimedia commons only accepts images which allow distribution and sharing, commercial use and derivation of new content from the original. Wikipedia itself prefers the use of free content, content which has less strict copyright restrictions. Non-free content is used on Wikipedia with limited exceptions only on non-article pages that are usually just reviews to question the non-free content. In the future I intend to avoid copyright violations by using multiple sources while creating an article and reviewing the licence of wikimedia commons images before using them. If you doubt that the consensus was reached before 5 June then compare the conclusion with the arguments that were initially written to get the image deleted, the argument questioned the sources being original while the conclusion cited American copyright laws. My intent on that edit was of anti-vandalism as it was an extended protected page already subject to discretionary sanctions which is why such actions need to be reverted before the consensus is formally reached, my edit was not an addition but rather a revertسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 03:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Non-free content is used on Wikipedia with limited exceptions only on non-article pages that are usually just reviews to question the non-free content." This is not accurate. Yamla (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Non-free content,i.e content that cannot be distributed, derived or used for any purpose even commercial is not allowed on Wikipedia. Non-free content can only be used on Wikipedia if it complies with the exemption rationale provided by wikipedia, that is if there is no other free alternative, if its use is necessary to make an article vivid and the content has appropriate copyright tags and explanation of the Wikipedia. The use of such content in violation of the rationale is however forbidden. Only specific non-article pages are exempt from Wikipedia's policies on non-free content, such pages are usually pages that are required to reach a consensus on the legitimacy of an image's copyright status. Such pages discuss whether the content is free or abides by Wikipedia's policies regarding non-free content, these pages are necessary to maintain abidance of copyright laws on wikipediaسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 06:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. As you clearly don't understand Wikipedia's policies on copyright and fair use, I have revoked talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Yamla (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ

Thank you for creating Al-Ta'ir (satellite).

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I know you're blocked now, but this is a good article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strikes toward ban

This user has repeatedly engaged in block evasion. Strike one is documented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/سب_سے_بڑی_گڑبڑ/Archive#22_June_2020 and strike two is TheIraqiAmericanYXT (checkuser-block). One more strike will lead to an indefinite ban under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 18:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I misread WP:3X. It only requires two instances of block evasion. That threshold is now reached. سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ is now banned, not just blocked. I'll update the user page to reflect this. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misagh-3 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Misagh-3, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tipu (missile)

Hello, سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tipu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ra'ad-II

Hello, سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ra'ad-II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Misagh-3

Hello, سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Misagh-3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 10:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]