User talk:מתיאל

Nomination of Tal slutzker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tal slutzker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tal slutzker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 13:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was stupid, therefore i'd removed it.

[user talk:מתיאל|X]]

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Tal slutzker, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nurit Zederboim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nurit Zederboim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurit Zederboim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i'm improving it with more soucrces. מתיאל (talk) 16:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Hey, here is a link for Doctor Zederboim Phd. This alone show the improtence of the article, Please keep it on the English Wikipedia

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1XkN_OOAAcyQldrUGpDN1FUajQ/view

מתיאל (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)מתיאלמתיאל (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, מתיאל, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

For a translation of the above message, please click the link below that matches your primary language.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Barr (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ted Barr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ted Barr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, מתיאל! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ted Barr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ted Barr, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ted Barr

Hello, מתיאל. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ted Barr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 00:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Gilead Duvshani, from its old location at User:מתיאל/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilead Duvshani (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilead Duvshani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gilead Duvshani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilead Duvshani (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sourcing is utterly inadequate. Every nontrivial assertion must be backed up by a specific (and of course reliable and independent) source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilead Duvshani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gilead Duvshani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 06:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I added a lot of sources, this is a major architect! the deletion is not moral מתיאל (talk) 07:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Here is "Draft:Gilead Duvshani". What has been deleted? This is the draft for a different biographical article, in the state it was in immediately before I moved it from draft to article. This is the very first version of yet another biographical article, this one written by myself. Notice how the pair differ from the draft on Duvshani? In each of the former pair: assertion, reference(s); assertion, reference(s); assertion, reference(s).... You provide no references. You do have a list of external links, but (i) there's no indication of which part of the draft is backed up at which link; and (ii) a number of them wouldn't qualify as reliable sources. -- Hoary (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a really important architect in the history of the development of Tel Aviv!!! מתיאל (talk) 11:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

I have not questioned this. I'll assume for now that it's true. All the more reason, then, to create a sound draft about him. I've explained what's required, and I've given you examples of new material satisfying this. So please go ahead and improve your draft. -- Hoary (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have a lot of sources in Hebrew, which was the language of all of his projects in Israel, is it ok? מתיאל (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilead Duvshani (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

please read WP:REFB fro help with formatting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilead Duvshani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gilead Duvshani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with the footnotes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gilead_Duvshani מתיאל (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ernesto Kahan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ernesto Kahan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 15:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is a crime, you can't do it, worked so hard and he deserve it, look at his resume. 15:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)מתיאל

May 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul A. Levine, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrote 2 times in the talk page the reasons מתיאל (talk) 08:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

July 2021

Hello מתיאל. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:מתיאל. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=מתיאל|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --- Possibly ☎ 19:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, but it is legal, i don't work for a firm or a business, just for me, should i write in every article about if it was under some little financial issue? מתיאל (talk) 14:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Please cheek if what i have written in my talk page in enoughמתיאל (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

[[User:Possibly] Please help me make it in the right way. מתיאל (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --- Possibly ☎ 20:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Possibly Please cheek if what i have written in my talk page in enoughמתיאל (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this pattern didn't work when i tried to add it to a talk page of a paid article.

מתיאל, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by InsertName for their contributions to Wikipedia.

מתיאל (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Used another pattern and it worked. מתיאל (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gilead Duvshani

Hello, מתיאל. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gilead Duvshani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What can i do? מתיאל (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Rachal Gitai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rachal Gitai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 22:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, but it has citation from newspapers and manuscripts in English and Hebrew, will go throw it again. מתיאל (talk) 07:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachal Gitai (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The long paragraph starting "Rachel was born in 1954 in Afula as Rachel Rosenblit" is unreferenced. The sections "Exhibitions" and "Artistic style" are unreferenced. The referencing elsewhere is rather perfunctory. Incidentally, which of the various Galicias is this, and how would it have a town named "Rosewood"?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachal Gitai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rachal Gitai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 00:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachal Gitai (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TTP1233 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachal Gitai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rachal Gitai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jyoti Roy (talk) 08:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachal Gitai (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Where is her notability? If it's as an artist, please demonstrate that she meets WP:ARTIST. If it's more general, then WP:PERSON.

A number of the references are incomprehensible. What is "North 1"? Where was Millard's piece published? What/where is "The Redemption Talk"?

If she's engaged in nephropathy, then why is there no mention of her medical qualifications? (Or is this "complementary" nephropathy?) If she's a behavioral scientist, then how does science square with homeopathy?

What is the "Zohar number", and where should one look in order to verify what's said about her "Artistic style"?

Why must this draft have external links to what the domain name suggests is a file-sharing site?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachal Gitai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rachal Gitai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 08:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachal Gitai (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:NARTIST?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachal Gitai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rachal Gitai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please make it clear exactly which articles you are being paid to edit

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:מתיאל, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=מתיאל|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rachal Gitai

Hello, מתיאל. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachal Gitai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rachal Gitai

Hello, מתיאל. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachal Gitai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Tell Ye Your Children

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tell Ye Your Children, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mars Roberge

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mars Roberge, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mars Roberge

Hello מתיאל, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mars Roberge, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mars Roberge.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sadads}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sadads (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hi מתיאל! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello מתיאל. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mars Roberge, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:מתיאל. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=מתיאל|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your edit suggests paid editing, and your disclosure on your user page says you're paid by "various". This is not adequate. The name of the person/entity paying you, and on whose behalf if applicable needs to be specifically disclosed. Graywalls (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not accepting money and following all of the rules. מתיאל (talk) 15:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not longer editing for pay, you need to clarify which articles you edited for pay, and put the paid editing template on your user page, identifying those articles, and who paid you to edit them. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi מתיאל! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. You continue to make edits as "minor" when they're not. Graywalls (talk) 00:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tal Slutzker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tal Slutzker, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tal Slutzker (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of minor edits

As you've been told at least twice, stop making contents change and marking them as "minor". Thanks Graywalls (talk) 08:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mars Roberge

Your behaviour here has swiftly become unhelpful. If you continue to copy/paste slabs of material into the AfD, rather than picking the sources you best believe show notability, they will be removed. Also, some of your comments about other contributors are not WP:CIVIL; please stop that or you may be blocked from the page. Black Kite (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not true, a community should help each other! I haven't insulted anybody. Another user has instulted me and called me a bot. מתיאל (talk) 09:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

This director does wonderful films and i'm trying to prevent a misdeed. מתיאל (talk) 09:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Having emotions is not a crime מתיאל (talk) 09:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Why to mark a list of sources as unhelpful? מתיאל (talk) 10:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Hello, מתיאל,

If this article is deleted, you can always work on a draft version and submit it to WP:AFC for review. Deletion doesn't have to be forever. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks liz מתיאל (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 13:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:מתיאל, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=מתיאל|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Netherzone (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:מתיאל, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=מתיאל|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Netherzone (talk) 18:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan

Can you please add a reference that states Israel and Sudan established diplomatic relations in 2021 ? This AP article from February 2023 state the two countries were planning on normalizing ties later that year and who knows the state of the negotiations today.[1] Semsûrî (talk) 09:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my bad. But please change it to three countries who signed the Abraham accords if you are removing Sudan. Right now the text says four. מתיאל (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks. Semsûrî (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My experience on Wikipedia

In my opinion, Wikipedia strives, in addition to providing knowledge, to make the world a better place, and indeed, there are some educated and kind-heated people here there were times when I enriched myself with my knowledge, wrote many entries and even made thousands of edits, but some cyberbullies hurt me. This is about some who are doing great damage to Wikipedia and not only to someone like me, a struggling person who used to live on social security benefits and a humanities graduate who has no profession, but to others as well and they caused a severe worsening of my mental state. At times I felt like I was in a particularly bad episode of Black Mirror. While my motive in the past was clear, including a financial motive (In the Hebrew Wikipedia only), the motives of those people who harm the values and efforts of other Wikipedia people and do not serve the highest good intentions are not clear. My health has been compromised and again, I hope the lesson was learned and there will be no more cyber bullying on Wikipedia. I forgive everyone who hurt me on Wikipedia. מתיאל (talk) 20:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Articles for deletion/Tal Slutzker (2nd nomination)

Thank you for contacting me. As you know, AfD is not decided by majority vote. The closing admin weighs the views of participants based on policy and guidelines, WP:DISCARDing those who bring up irrelevant arguments, or whose edit history suggests they aren't here to build an encyclopedia. For example, user account Baculur was created yesterday specifically to "vote" in this AfD.

Counting the number of exhibitions in which an artist displayed their work is not, by itself, evidence of notability. There is still a requirement that the artist receive significant coverage from multiple, independent, reliable sources. Sources like Maariv are certainly reliable, but the consensus in the AfD was that coverage depth did not meet our WP:NBIO guidelines. Owen× ☎ 21:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But it was other sources like the Jerusalem Post, channel 10, Iltv, and more. please reconsider. In my opinion, Maariv alone is enough, and also, some experienced, neutral users vote for him.

"It is better and more desirable to absolve a thousand sinners than to kill one innocent one someday"

(Maimonides) מתיאל (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a big fan of the רמב״ם - the greatest legislator since the original Moses (although רבי יהודה הנשיא comes in at a close third). But we are not sitting here in judgement of a person. We are trying to decide if an article is suitable or not for inclusion in an encyclopedia. This is an editorial decision, not דיני נפשות. Does Slutzker's future depend on him having a page on the English Wikipedia? If it does, we definitely don't want a page about him, since we only cover artists who have already established their notability without our help. Slutzker's case wasn't clear-cut, but I feel I applied my administrative discretion correctly in giving more weight to the views that were based on guidelines. My suggestion for you is to wait six months, and then present any new sources covering the artist at WP:REFUND. Consensus can change, and new evidence may tilt the balance the other way. Owen× ☎ 11:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was very surprised to find צדיקים on Wikipedia, well done to you. Regarding דיני נפשות. It's right on the border, in this case as i know it. In any case, the sources that were cited after the beginning of the discussion, such as Jerusalem Post, Ma'ariv, Arutz 10, etc., and his books (which did not appear before) indicate in my opinion their notablity. As a fan of the רמב"ם, you know the impotence of doing injustice and avoiding a miss-dead. therefore, I ask not to wait six months, and not to wait until his next book in English will be publish and confirm the article. Another major argumentÖ whoever placed the template on the article and started the AFD did so as a personal revenge against me for another AFD that got out of control. Therefore, the whole discussion about Tal was "born in sin", and not from a proper procedure of Wikipedia or good will. Thanks for listening. מתיאל (talk) 14:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a fan of retributive AfD nominations any more than you are. But we do not, and must not, close an AfD differently based on the (assumed) motivation of the nominator. You're welcome to try your luck at WP:REFUND earlier than six months, and אי"ה, things will go your way. Owen× ☎ 15:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but why leaving it to Hashem? If it is under your authority?

This dialogue restores some faith in me. מתיאל (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin, I have some discretion over how I close some AfDs. But even here, in this בית דין של מטה, I'd be shirking my duty if I changed results based on the request of the most persistent participant, against the legitimate views of other participants (and my own best judgement). I think Mr. Slutzker will do just fine for a few months without an article about him on the English Wikipedia. Owen× ☎ 17:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, and i don't want to be a burden, just saying that a lot of participating people were in favor of the article, and they are the majority (Even if it doesn't count) and those participators have more sources, better arguments, and most of them bothered to read the article, with the new information, corrections and sources. I see it as a miss-dead against him and just asking for justice. And you know, even in a few months from now, the people who were against him, will continue to be like that, regardless of what the facts are. I have the same difficulties when discussing with antisemitic people (Not this AFD That was likely not because of antisemitism), It's like the world has lost his mind מתיאל (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)מתיאל[reply]

Warning to מתיאל: This is the umpteenth time you have engaged in a serious personall attack against me, an attack that now contains a smear ("this AFD was likely not because of antisemitism" - likely?!). You wrote "Another major argument [is that] whoever placed the template on the article and started the AFD [which is me, of course] did, so as a personal revenge against me for another AFD that got out of control." You are referring, of course, to this wretched AfD that you turned into a bludgeoning exhibition, as other editors pointed out to you - to no avail, naturally.
For the record, after the derailment of that AfD, I went to your Contributions page, in order to examine the nature of your contributions to Wikipedia. Your extreme actions ("I'm posting in a rage," you wrote) certainly warranted that. I also examined the articles to which you contributed or which you created. Out of all those, I came upon the bio on Tal Slutzker, which IMVHO deserved an AfD nomination. I did so in a fair manner. I even closed the AfD myself with a speedy keep decision in order to avoid more drama, but was warned that my closing was irregular and re-opened the AfD. And after more contributions, an uninvolved admin closed it down as a Delete. That was all.
I demand that you stop any and all references to my work or my person in any Wikipedia page, including talk pages. I do not want you to even respond to this message, not even to my explanation about the Tal Slutzker AfD. We two need to take a serious break from each other - and I hope you're capable of that.
If you have a complaint against me, please submit it to the appropriate forums, where, you can be sure, it will examined with diligence and objectivity. Next time I see anything like you just did, even as a response to this message, I'm sorry but I will have to report you. I value my time here too much to have it wasted in petty matters. Please reconsider. -The Gnome (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irgun

Raised the issue of their description at NPOV and telling you as you were reverted. Doug Weller talk 17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editwarring

Stop editwarring on Battle of Bint Jbeil. The last 12 edits to the page have been you and BangladeshiEditorInSylhet making the same trivial revert of each other. Take content issues to the talk page. Longhornsg (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editwarring 2

When your edits are challenged, the way forward is to discuss on the talk page, not reinstate them per WP:BRD. [2] This isn’t the first time this has happened on ARBPIA articles and shows a consistent behavioral editing problem. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent edit warring

Please stop edit warring and discuss on the talk page. [3], [4]. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Statement by Levivich (Nishidani) Levivich (talk) 05:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Your user page stated that you have been paid to edit. However, you have removed that disclosure (which would render that undisclosed paid editing), and the disclosure never met the requirement to start with, as it listed "various" rather than naming each employer.[5] Your next edit must disclose each and every employer for whom you have edited Wikipedia by name, as well as any client or affiliation, as required by the paid editing policy. If your next edit is anything other than making these disclosures or asking for assistance or clarification with doing so, you will be blocked from editing. If you remove them again, the same result will occur. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never in the English Wiki and never since 2021! There is already a clarification about it! מתיאל (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you haven't edited the English Wikipedia for pay, then that would not be necessary. Other projects may have their own policies regarding that, but we'd only be concerned with any paid editing here. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1RR violation

Please self-revert your latest edit at November 2024 Amsterdam riot to comply with 1RR: [6] [7] Makeandtoss (talk) 13:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]