User talk:Ավետիսյան91/Archive/2020

July 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ավետիսյան91/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that such content is considered an advertisement in Wikipedia and I am not going to make such edits in the future. Please change block type from indefinitely to certain time, for example 1 or 2 months. Thank you Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 18:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address whether you've been engaging in undisclosed paid editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate, You accuse me of engaging in undisclosed paid editing, but you have no facts. That does not correspond to reality. I wrote that article because I was interested in it. Yes, some parts of the article were non-encyclopedic, which I accept, I will refrain from such edits in the future, but I did not engage in undisclosed paid editing. That is not a reality. --Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Sparro, Sydney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sparro, Sydney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ավետիսյան91/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am once again asking you to unblock me. I do not intend to make any further edits that may be considered undisclosed paid editing. I think that the blocking should not be a punishment, but a way to stop the harmful edits. I'm not going to go against the rules of Wikipedia. Please unblock me. Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say you won't make further edits that may be considered UPE, but you don't concede that's what you have been doing. You'll need to describe what paid editing relationships you have before we can consider unblocking you. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot I have not received any payment for any editing. I wrote that article on my own initiative. This is the whole reality.--Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 13:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another request, but if you are not a paid editor, you don't need to say "I do not intend to make any further edits that may be considered undisclosed paid editing". You either are a paid editor or you aren't. You don't have to be specifically paid for your edits or directed to edit by someone else to be a paid editor. Whether you are paid or not, if you have any conflicts of interest, you will need to disclose them. 331dot (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

331dot, Thank you for the clarification and for the link. The reality is the following: I've cooperated with that company in the field of information technologies. I know the company's employees in real life, and I wanted their article to be on Wikipedia, but for that, I repeat, I was not paid. I did it on a voluntary basis. It is possible that there is a real conflict of interest here, because I am interested in that company and I know them. I can not say anything more.--Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, you may make another request, for a heretofore uninvolved administrator to review. 331dot (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ավետիսյան91/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to inform you that I have written an article about the organization with which I cooperated, I personally knew the employees of that organization, due to which I was blocked. I think it had an impact on the content of the article. I did not receive any order or compensation for creating the article. I wrote it on my own initiative. I inform the English Wikimedia Administration that in the future I will refrain from editing the articles of persons or organizations affiliated with me. I have been blocked for four months already. Please remove the block so that I can contribute to the development of the project with my investments.

Decline reason:

I don't believe there's enough here to seriously consider unblocking you. You don't exactly specify the nature of your relationship with the company, or even which company this is. I understand that you wish to be circumspect, but that's incompatible with unblocking you here. Yamla (talk) 19:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ավետիսյան91/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked in July 2020 for editing advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. I've created this article. Sparro is a digital marketing agency. I am a programmer, I once worked with that company in the field of search engine optimization. I just wanted to write an article about them. Please unblock me. I will no longer edit articles with which I have a conflict of interest. Thank you. Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 06:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.