User talk:Ավետիսյան91

Welcome!

Hello, Ավետիսյան91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qed237 (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Stepanekert vs Blockade of Artsakh

Hey, i wasn't sure how to tag you elsewhere (please delete this if im putting it in the wrong place). I think the siege of Stepanekert is part of but distinct from the First Blockade of Artsakh. One could say a "mini" blockade

Ive seen a few sources state that the blockade started in 1988 and ended in May 1992. Or that it was "4 years" long which is much longer than the siege of stepanekert. Eg. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/07/01/Lachin-is-a-ghost-town-a-crowd-of-burned-out/2082709963200/

Happy to be wrong! Just looking for clarification Humanatbest (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Humanatbest. Yes, you are right. The first big blockade was in 1988-1992. The Siege of Stepanekert is a small part of that blockade, about which I've added 2 sentences and the link to that article. I think it relates to the main topic and deserves to be in the "Background" section. You can just copy my username to tag me; {{u|Ավետիսյան91}}. Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 09:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

// Timothy :: talk 18:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimothyBlue. I'm not sure why you undo my edit, if I mentioned the reason for it in the summary (move the reaction of Armenia from the "Involved parties" section, as the conflict is not in the territory of Armenia, Armenia is not directly or indirectly involved in the blockade of Artsakh). If you had objections to my editing, you could open a discussion on the article or on my talk page, and substantiate with reliable, secondary sources that Armenia is really considered an involved party in the blockade of Artsakh. With respects: Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]