User talk:Цйфыву

Boris Moiseev, R.I.P.

Greetings, Цйфыву. Please see my reply to the issue you raised on Talk:Boris Moiseev. I hope the page can be improved soon. Your input is appreciated. -- Deborahjay (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Буду испотзовать страницы ТЕМ Цйфыву (talk) 15:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Smallpox, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Similarly, this user removed Russia-related content without explanation in other articles,[1][2][3] while on the other hand adding uncited claims to the BLP of another Russian[4]. Wikipedia is not censored. HouseOfChange (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi Цйфыву! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Symphony No. 13 (Shostakovich) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of Pereslavl, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Стоп

Здравствуйте! Вы удалили текст в некоторых статьях, без объяснений и без причин. Это нарушает правила Википедии и очень грубо по отношению к другим участникам. Пожалуйста, прекратите это делать, иначе бан неизбежен. Вас уже заблокировали в русской Википедии. Ostalgia (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Цйфыву (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me Цйфыву (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.