User:Yunye2017/sandbox

Article evaluation

I viewed an article on Wikipedia related to our APA format learning (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APA_style#cite_note-3). I think everything in the article is relevant to the article topic but I think some part like "Errors in the first printing" may cause panic. The introduction is neutral. And I check all the citations which work perfectly. The source also support the claims well in the article and the information comes from books and Apa official website.

However, I think it can be added more information such as how to cite article in a magazine, newspaper or letter to the editor.

I've checked the Talk page of the article. It's the first time I see that there are so many interesting conversations going on behind the scenes about how to perfect a topic. Because of non-stop questioning, the infront page can be modified better and better.This article is within the scope of 3 WikiProject and has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

In a word, I think the article can add more useful information because we have learned far more content in our RPM class.

I concerned only one question about this article because I found that there is no basic APA format instruction such as Margins, Font or Heading etc. I think this article can be complemented more content.

Yunye2017 (talk) 03:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC).

This is fine Yunye2017, though you could have put this onto your own Sandbox User page itself. However, your review overall is fine. I wonder, given how Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a user guide, if the APA article itself should really have that level of detail? FULBERT (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

I agree, since Wikipedia is an science overview it may don't need details at that level. I just thought if there sums some typical feature that may be better for the reader to recognize APA format. @FULBERT:

link to APA

Citing Test

@#$%^&

$%^&*()