Jump to content

User:The ed17/Archives/96

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Research tag

Can you tell me about the Wikipedia for Research tags being added to upcoming TFAs?--Wehwalt (talk) 00:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

I went into bold mode after a discussion at WT:MILHIST. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Ed, I think you wrote a summary for this one back in March. I've tweaked it a bit; what do you think? It needs trimming, but I might ask to go over 1200 characters with this, I haven't decided. - Dank (push to talk) 03:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Dank: Are you sure you don't want to hold that for April Fool's Day? :-) I'll see what I can do to shorten it. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Imzadi asked Chris about that, he said no. I've already trimmed it a bit. - Dank (push to talk) 04:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Ah, gotcha. Let me know what you think about "worthless" in there—the word sounds like POV but is used in the article. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm going to revert some of that, I shouldn't tackle it now because I'm sleepy and not in the best mood. - Dank (push to talk) 04:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
No worries! Sleep well. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
1140 characters now! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Okay, you definitely made it better, although it needed some copyediting, at least according to the way I usually do things at TFA. I tried to explain, see what you think. (Sigh ... not even finished with the current batch of 4 TFAs, and I see I have 5 more now.) - Dank (push to talk) 14:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
@Dank: Looks good to me. Don't overburden yourself, friend. :-/ Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
I think it would be helpful if I could care a little less. I'm trying to clear out some time to write up my notes of the last 6 years ... unsuccessfully, so far. - Dank (push to talk) 16:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

ru:HMS Dreadnought (1906) (Russian)

Hi, Ed! Look at the Russian article. There are some useful vector images depicting the Father of all dreadnoughts. --Maxrossomachin (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

@Maxrossomachin: Those are seriously awesome! There's a lot of detail in them. Is there any chance they could translate some or all the images into English? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
It's a plain vector so anyone can translate them via text editor. I will translate some of them. --Maxrossomachin (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Please check the images recently uploaded to the English article. --Maxrossomachin (talk) 10:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Maxrossomachin: Those are great! I'll work on the formatting soon—I think {{gallery}} or a similar template will look better. I'll figure something out. Thank you! :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Nice! --Maxrossomachin (talk) 10:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 14

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
  • Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2015



Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Bzuk. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

It's that season again...

Happy Saturnalia
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
@Ealdgyth: Same to you. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15c}} to your friends' talk pages.

@WereSpielChequers: thanks! All the best to you and your family as well. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and happy new year

Merry Christmas and happy new year. (:

--Pine✉

Right back at you, Pine! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 24:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
@78.26: no problem. Wield the tools carefully but confidently—you're going to do great. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #6—2015

Read this in another language • Subscription list

Did you know?

A new, simpler system for editing will offer a single Edit button. Once the page has opened, you can switch back and forth between visual and wikitext editing.

Screenshot showing a pop-up dialog for switching from the wikitext editor to VisualEditor
If you prefer having separate edit buttons, then you can set that option in your preferences, either in a pop-up dialog the next time you open the visual editor, or by going to Special:Preferences and choosing the setting that you want:
Screenshot showing a drop-down menu in Special:Preferences

The current plan is for the default setting to have the Edit button open the editing environment you used most recently.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs and expanded the mathematics formula tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for languages such as Japanese and Arabic, and providing rich-media tools for formulæ, charts, galleries and uploading.

Recent improvements

You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing.

The LaTeX mathematics formula editor has been significantly expanded. (T118616) You can see the formula as you change the LaTeX code. You can click buttons to insert the correct LaTeX code for many symbols.

Future changes

The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab, like the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as a cookie for logged-out users and as an account preference for logged-in editors. Logged-in editors will be able to set a default editor in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences in the drop-down menu about "Editing mode:".

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the following Wikipedias in early 2016: Amharic, Buginese, Min Dong, Cree, Manx, Hakka, Armenian, Georgian, Pontic, Serbo-Croatian, Tigrinya, Mingrelian, Zhuang, and Min Nan. (T116523) Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. The developers would like to know how well it works. Please tell them what kind of computer, web browser, and keyboard you are using.

In 2016, the feedback pages for the visual editor on many Wikipedias will be redirected to mediawiki.org. (T92661)

Testing opportunities

  • Please try the new system for the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You can edit while logged out to see how it works for logged-out editors, or you can create a separate account to be able to set your account's preferences. Please share your thoughts about the single edit tab system at the feedback topic on mediawiki.org or sign up for formal user research (type "single edit tab" in the question about other areas you're interested in). The new system has not been finalized, and your feedback can affect the outcome. The team particularly wants your thoughts about the options in Special:Preferences. The current choices in Special:Preferences are:
    • Remember my last editor,
    • Always give me the visual editor if possible, 
    • Always give me the source editor, and 
    • Show me both editor tabs.  (This is the current state for people using the visual editor. None of these options will be visible if you have disabled the visual editor in your preferences at that wiki.)
  • Can you read and type in Korean or Japanese? Language engineer David Chan needs people who know which tools people use to type in some languages. If you speak Japanese or Korean, you can help him test support for these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help, and report it on Phabricator (Korean - Japanese) or on Wikipedia (Korean - Japanese).

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

Whatamidoing (WMF), 00:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2.219.248.118/Archive

Hi Ed, there's nothing wrong with commenting after closure, but you commented after archival. That's not something you should do. It would have been better to contact either the clerk or me with your concerns rather than edit the archive itself. That said, I'm not sure what you want done. How do you suggest we go about finding out if there are more IPs out there that are connected? The filer generally has to present evidence of socks, whether they are named accounts or IPs, and the filer identified only three in the case. The filer did not request a CU, which, arguably, might be able to do more than a clerk in a case like this, but a CU is only justified if there's sufficient evidence to trigger it. Anyway, I'm willing to do something further, including unarchiving the case, but only if I understand what that is and I think it's reasonable. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Sorry about that. There's a lengthy history of different IPs editing John Calvin; see #Your thoughts and #IP is back above. I really do think a CU is justified, but that's an unqualified opinion, as I know very little about the intricacies of CU policy. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
As I understand it from others' comments above (I'm not familiar with the case), there is a swath of related (?) articles that IPs have been attacking in similar ways, leading you and other editors to believe they all belong to the same person (whoever that is). According to another CheckUser, range blocks aren't feasible, which usually means there are too many ranges. You want a check run to see if other IPs can be found and preemptively blocked. Is that about right?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Well. When you put it that way, maybe not. I guess blocks are pretty useless if they're range-hopping so much that a rangeblock isn't feasible. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_ed17/Archives/96&oldid=1083649028"