User:The ed17/Archives/160
This is an archive of past discussions about User:The ed17. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
September thanks
my story today |
---|
Thank you for ITN work! My story yesterday was The Company of Heaven, - I like your company! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda Arendt! Ed [talk] [OMT] 04:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for posting Claus Wisser. Can you please give me credit? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
- An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text:
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
- Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
- The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Bill Duplissea (baseball)
On 11 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bill Duplissea (baseball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bill Duplissea has been said to have the "best eyes in baseball"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Duplissea (baseball). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bill Duplissea (baseball)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Wade
[1] I would say more like tea in a teacup, but potato/potahto, no? VQuakr (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Edit warring violation
You have violated the 1RR in place on Kfar Aza massacre. Please self-revert. Jeppiz (talk) 18:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing that. I made an edit that removed some information that wasn't supported by the citations given. I don't see that action as falling under the definition of reverting (see the paragraph beginning "Any edit to existing text ..."). I also then reverted your edit because its content was still unsupported by the sources given. Please feel free to bring this to WP:AN3, but I would be unpleasantly surprised if I was reversed. Ed [talk] [OMT] 19:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Ok, happy to oblige Jeppiz (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Triplex locomotive
Hello, The ed17 –
Looking at this article’s history, I believe you were the editor who added the Quadruplex and Quintuplex section, under the heading “Expanding the Concept.” Is this correct? (I added the Quad patent drawing and amended the technical description, and a bit of editing to the Quint.)
I’m currently in a dialogue on the talk page with another editor who has made substantial additions in the last few weeks, which I consider to be seriously over-reaching, and which alter the whole character of the article. Basically, he/she has inserted every locomotive type which has multiple engines, and used some logic which seems pretty dodgy (in my opinion) to justify this. Even the meaning of “concept” has been changed to suit that agenda.
I’d be very obliged if you could look at the article to see what I mean, and I ask for your views. I’d welcome you to join the discussion, as I think it would benefit from some third-party input, or even mediation: At this stage it’s a stalemate verging on the acrimonious and personal.
Many thanks for your consideration. Kokopelli-UK (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Kokopelli-UK: Thanks for reaching out. I don't have time at the moment to dive into this, but I'd advise you post a neutral request over at WP:Third opinion. Apologies! Ed [talk] [OMT] 05:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for If I Survive You
On 26 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article If I Survive You, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NPR favorably compared a story in Jonathan Escoffery's debut book If I Survive You to Moby-Dick? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/If I Survive You. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, If I Survive You), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
my story today |
---|
- Thank you for your share in this interesting article! The author has an article now, - can you please copy a ref from the book to there? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
ITN change needed
Could you update the new ITN for the 2023 Lewiston shootings? There are 18 dead and 13 injured per a news conference. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of 2-8-8-8-2 for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2-8-8-8-2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Chris Troutman (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
(C&P from User talk:マイヤー式機関車 --マイヤー式機関車 (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC))
WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
- BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
- Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
- Epicgenius with 1518 points
- MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
- BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
- AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
- Sammi Brie with 520 points
- Unlimitedlead with 5 points
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
- Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
- BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
- LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
- Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
- Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
- Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
- Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
- Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
- Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
- An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
- The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 59
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
- Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
- Tech tip: Library access methods
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June. Drive: Of the 69 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Of the 22 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz, 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Drive: During the November Backlog Elimination Drive, 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Our December Copy Editing Blitz will run from 10 to 16 December. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles. Other news: Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Draft:NouveauShamanic
Hello, I greatly respect your opinions and insight. I was hoping if you find the time you could help me build up this draft as i’m again attempting for it to be recognized as my first and actual Wikipedia page. I believe it holds merit to be one, with your knowledge and prowess I am hoping to make it even better. Thank you! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Elvisisalive95: I've added two more potential sources. It's pretty likely that this is best covered in the main Nicholas Cage article, but best of luck in getting it over the bars at WP:GNG and WP:PAGEDECIDE ("at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context (and doing so in no way disparages the importance of the topic)"). Ed [talk] [OMT] 18:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Again, I thank you for your insight & help. We’re all lucky to have you & Wikipedia is a better place because of your contributions, fairness & kindness. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
I think Potassium should be not protected.
I mean that all above. 2001:EE0:4BC4:8D40:65D1:E41F:7E97:C466 (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello! You should make this request first at User talk:Materialscientist, who originally protected this article, and if they decline you can try WP:RFUP. Good luck! Ed [talk] [OMT] 18:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
December greetings
December: story · music · places |
---|
Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. - I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks! I hope you're well! Ed [talk] [OMT] 17:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- You can click on story - music - places and check, - I try to update. Perhaps more interesting than a plain yes ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasonal greetings!!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! | |
Hello The ed17, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
RFA
Hi, I can't say I'm thrilled with spending my own time in the evening writing a well-thought out comment just to have it removed, The RFA was open when I hit edit so felt in that circumstance it should've stayed, But I guess rules are rules, Just a shame @Ingenuity couldn't have closed it 10 minutes later :), Thank you for at least apologising that does mean a lot, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)