Jump to content

User:The ed17/Archives/117

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 South Asian Floods

Nice work cleaning up that mess and getting it suitable for the main page. --CosmicAdventure (talk) 11:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

@CosmicAdventure: Thanks! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 16:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Brazilian coastal defense ship Deodoro

On 6 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brazilian coastal defense ship Deodoro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Brazilian coastal defense ship Deodoro (pictured) was once mistaken for a war-bound privateer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brazilian coastal defense ship Deodoro. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Brazilian coastal defense ship Deodoro), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bartley-Fox Law

On 6 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bartley-Fox Law, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bartley-Fox Law mandated a one-year prison sentence for anyone convicted of illegally carrying a firearm in Massachusetts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bartley-Fox Law. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bartley-Fox Law), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

Roma/Operation Avalanche

Hello, could you take a look here? --Olonia (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@Olonia: Done! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 16:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2017





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 4 – 18 September 2017

Facto Post – Issue 4 – 18 September 2017

Editorial: Conservation data

The IUCN Red List update of 14 September led with a threat to North American ash trees. The International Union for Conservation of Nature produces authoritative species listings that are peer-reviewed. Examples used as metonyms for loss of species and biodiversity, and discussion of extinction rates, are the usual topics covered in the media to inform us about this area. But actual data matters.

Dorstenia elata, a critically endangered South American herb, contained in Moraceae, the family of figs and mulberries

Clearly, conservation work depends on decisions about what should be done, and where. While animals, particularly mammals, are photogenic, species numbers run into millions. Plant species lie at the base of typical land-based food chains, and vegetation is key to the habitats of most animals.

ContentMine dictionaries, for example as tabulated at d:Wikidata:WikiFactMine/Dictionary list, enable detailed control of queries about endangered species, in their taxonomic context. To target conservation measures properly, species listings running into the thousands are not what is needed: range maps showing current distribution are. Between the will to act, and effective steps taken, the services of data handling are required. There is now no reason at all why Wikidata should not take up the burden.

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for The Stone Sky

On 19 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Stone Sky, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that N. K. Jemisin's The Stone Sky has been favorably compared to works by famed science fiction authors Ursula K. Le Guin and William Gibson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Stone Sky. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Stone Sky), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Disruptive Editting at ITN

You cannot both reopen a discussion where people have voted, and change the subject at hand entirely. As noted at ITN, I sympathize with the Catalan cause. But you must start a new discussion, rather than disenfranchise those who already voted. Start a new nomination, and invite people to vote on it. If you reopen the archived discussion again I will file an ANI report to have you sanctioned for disruptive editting. None of this means that those who support your new proposal can't support it--but we simply do not change the question in the middle of a debate because we don't like the trend. μηδείς (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

It's fine, and hardly disruptive to acknowledge that a discussion has evolved. Admins are trusted to gauge the community support before promoting and I'm sure they'll take your concerns seriously. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I genuinely didn't think it was a big deal, Medeis; there's no need for threats. I don't think your close was improper, but as the subjects are inexorably linked, I felt that opening a new discussion would be seen as a sort of forum shopping. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Well, as you can see, at least two admins and a third editor agreed with me, and the nomination is closed once again. Is it not clear the re-opening was indeed disruptive?
I am not one to be vindictive, please just follow protocol, especially when it is clearly pointed out to you. As it stood, your actions were like a prosecutor in a show trial who changed the charge to witchcraft when he felt he couldn't prove wire fraud. I do encourage you to repost this later when a vote is held if it does indeed lead to a secession majority and a constitutional crisis. You'll have my support. μηδείς (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm confused by your hyperbole. Yes, with the benefit of hindsight, I'd say that re-opening the discussion for the reasons I did was the wrong decision. Sure. But it wasn't deliberately disruptive, nor do I see why you felt the need to threaten me. I also don't at all see how your metaphor works, as witchcraft and wire fraud are completely unrelated subjects, and Catalonian independence and the Spanish constitutional crisis are very much related. But I digress, and let's move on. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

Your GA nomination of Dorothy P. Rice

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dorothy P. Rice you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 06:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Coordinator of the Military History Project, September 2017 – September 2018

In recognition of your election as one of the Military History Project's Co-ordinators, please accept these Co-ordinator's stars. Thank you for your ongoing efforts in support of the project. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, AustralianRupert. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)