User:Teratix/PROD log

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2018

1. Community Access, Inc.: PROD; notified Manangnono (talk · contribs) 12:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional since 2008, created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest.
2. Blobbies Wars: PROD; notified JAF1970 (talk · contribs) 23:22, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for videogames. No coverage outside of official sources.

September 2018

1. Community Friendly Movement: PROD; notified 12.236.236.230 (talk · contribs) 10:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. No independent coverage.
2. DRG Technologies: PROD; notified RyanW124 (talk · contribs) 13:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
3. ACER Racing: PROD; notified Infotech1990 (talk · contribs) 10:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No independent coverage. Fails WP:NCORP.
4. Edge-Sweets Company: PROD; notified 64.198.199.124 (talk · contribs) 01:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced. Fails WP:NCORP.
5. Fruitpunch: PROD; notified 219.77.2.195 (talk · contribs) 02:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NBAND. (WP:MYSPACEBAND).
6. Mirabai Devi: PROD; notified Wmloving (talk · contribs) 23:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: No independent coverage (fails WP:GNG)
7. Raishaun Henderson: PROD; notified Shaunray9 (talk · contribs) 11:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Per WP:NGRIDIRON; never played a match in a top-level league.
8. International Director's Guild Awards: PROD; notified Kmellenberg (talk · contribs) 11:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Promotional WP:SPA article.
9. MediaNow: PROD; notified Severfire (talk · contribs) 09:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. Extensive WP:SPA editing.

October 2018

1. Consumer alert system: PROD 12:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Only sources are forum posts and a brief profile in SpywareGuide. Nothing special or notable about this adware compared to the thousands of other programs out there.
2. Entempo: PROD; notified Oli888 (talk · contribs) 12:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP.
3. Randy Shaver Cancer Research and Community Fund: PROD; notified Keckenrod (talk · contribs) 01:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sadly, the charity does not meet WP:NCORP, particularly considering that coverage of purely local events is trivial coverage.
4. Client Music Synthesis: PROD; notified Mcapozza (talk · contribs) 01:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Undisclosed conflict-of-interest editing.
5. Double Loves: PROD; notified Zephyr103 (talk · contribs) 23:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced since 2006, fails WP:NPRODUCT.
6. Cool English: PROD; notified Kernowverno (talk · contribs) 06:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline.

January 2019

1. Bengali spices and their English names: PROD 13:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced version of List of Bangladeshi spices.
2. Selfie Pod: PROD; notified Jimpees (talk · contribs) 02:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: No sources. Fails WP:GNG.

March 2019

1. Aspen dollar: PROD; notified EoGuy (talk · contribs) 23:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG.The only substantive source I could find was an unreliable blog.
2. Bianca Nobilo: PROD; notified MilanCela (talk · contribs) 12:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lack of independent, reliable sources

April 2019

1. Ananya Kamboj: PROD; notified Vikramkamboj (talk · contribs) 14:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Won one competition of dubious notability, which garnered all relevant media coverage. Fails WP:BLP1E. Clear conflict of interest editing (subject appears to be primary author's daughter).
2. Fave Media: PROD; notified S84web (talk · contribs) 02:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP.
3. Global Data Intelligence Limited: PROD; notified Trymemore (talk · contribs) 01:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies: sources are either passing mentions, press releases, unreliable sources or indiscriminate database profiles.

July 2019

1. Tharshan Thiyagarajah: BLP PROD; notified Jaiwikijai (talk · contribs) 10:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
2. GlobalX: PROD; notified Mantuku (talk · contribs) 10:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guidelines for companies. (Not to be confused with Global X ETFs, which came up a lot in my source searches).

August 2019

1. Fatmaarsan: BLP PROD; notified Fatmaarsan (talk · contribs) 03:55, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
2. Lauron Technologies: PROD 06:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. All references either don't refer to the company itself or are not independent.

November 2019

1. Aussie Rules International: PROD; notified Expatkiwi (talk · contribs) 04:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline, no content worth merging, no plausible redirect target.

January 2020

1. Wintertree: PROD; notified Superjca2000 (talk · contribs) 14:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NPRODUCT; article only sourced to official website, and a further search only turned up passing mentions or unreliable sources (e.g. affiliated websites, forums, and download links). No obvious merge target.

February 2020

1. Farebrother: PROD; notified Tomsthename (talk · contribs) 23:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NBAND.
2. Archives for London: PROD; notified Sianwj (talk · contribs) 09:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Painfully aware of irony of nominating archival service for deletion; however, I can't find any sources discussing it beyond passing mentions (e.g. "AfL set up such-and-such service", "X, in partnership with AfL, did such-and-such" or "Joe Bloggs held such-and-such position at AfL") and affiliated sources.

March 2020

1. Drama 2.0: PROD 06:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Obvious self-promotion, see [potemkino.com/42/ blog matching username of page creator]. No acceptable sources found, fails WP:GNG.
2. REACT (nonprofit organization): PROD 06:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced and promotional. No acceptable sources found in a further search. Fails WP:NCORP.
3. Strong Australia: PROD 05:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP.
4. Zackammy: PROD; notified Anonys11 (talk · contribs) 13:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guidelines for biographies. WP:TOOSOON, probable advertising.

April 2020

1. Orchidia: PROD 13:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced and promotional, fails WP:NCORP. Page creator has an obvious conflict of interest. The little reliable coverage I could find in a search was solely routine and insignificant (e.g. [1])
2. Schmersal: PROD 14:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP, creator is a single-purpose account.
3. Foreverlamp: PROD 06:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, fails WP:NCORP, creator is obvious single-purpose account, promotional tone

May 2020

1. EdWare: PROD; notified Curluke (talk · contribs) 04:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, fails the notability guideline for companies.

July 2020

1. D3 LED: PROD 04:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. Sourced only to official website, and search results only turned up passing mentions or affiliated/promotional coverage.
2. Sonic Boom, Inc.: PROD 04:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. Unsourced except for official website, and no adequate sources found on a further search. Creator has exclusively edited promotionally.
3. Marketnews Magazine: PROD 06:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline. A search revealed no sources beyond passing mentions or brief listings in large databases. Created by obvious single-purpose account, evidently an employee of the magazine.

August 2020

1. EZ-Frame: PROD 04:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG.
2. Desktop Engineering: PROD 03:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Completely unsourced, fails WP:NCORP. Promotional tone, created by a single-purpose account with a probable conflict of interest.
3. Just a Drop: PROD; notified Ans-mo (talk · contribs) 11:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for organisations.
4. Lalemand Behaviour Scale: PROD 13:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline. Creator is obviously associated with the organisation employing the tool.
5. Odikyo: PROD 07:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG, completely unsourced.
6. Energy Storage Challenge: PROD 04:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline, promotional tone and content, some WP:COATRACK problems.
7. LITE Leather: PROD 04:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG, no independent sources found.

September 2020

1. Silicon Valley Association of Startup Entrepreneurs: PROD 03:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for organisations. Unsourced with a promotional tone.
2. Green Festivals: PROD 04:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline. Unsourced with a promotional tone.
3. D C Leisure Management: PROD; notified BenjMartin (talk · contribs) 04:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Unsourced, all sources found were either not independent, covered routine matters such as acquisitions or only mentioned the company in passing.
4. Laser Corporation: PROD 04:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies; no reliable, independent sources that give the subject more than a passing mention were found in the article or in my searches. Promotional tone, created by a single-purpose account with an obvious conflict of interest.
5. Klick2Contact: PROD 04:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. No reliable, independent sources that gave the subject more than routine coverage or a passing mention were found in the article or in my searches.
6. Trico Homes: PROD 01:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
7. Martin Audio: PROD 14:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Highly promotional tone, some copyright violations suspected.
8. Yellowfin Business Intelligence: PROD 04:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone.
9. Quod Financial: PROD 11:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone.
10. Revulytics: PROD 10:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. No qualifying coverage found under Revulytics, V.I. Labs or Trackerbird Software Analytics. Press releases, blogs, passing mentions and non-notable awards do not qualify. Creator has obvious COI.
11. Opmantek: PROD 10:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
12. DVP Media: PROD 10:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies
13. Hurix Systems: PROD 07:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Highly promotional tone.
14. IQuate: PROD 10:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
15. Hubba (software company): PROD 12:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
16. ThoughtSpeed Corporation: PROD 12:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies
17. Xkoto: PROD 12:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies
18. Frozen Mountain: PROD 13:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
19. Green Vision Media: PROD 13:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
20. Kivuto Solutions Inc: PROD 13:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
21. Nulogy: PROD 13:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. This Globe and Mail coverage might be decent (can't read without creating an account), but even in the best-case scenario where this article contributes to satisfying notability guidelines, NCORP requires multiple sources to qualify.

October 2020

1. PatientWay: PROD 14:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
2. Jostle Corporation: PROD 14:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies; the Globe and Mail coverage is decent, but NCORP requires multiple qualifying sources.
3. JibInfo System: PROD 01:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
4. Netsentron: PROD 02:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for products
5. BlueBean: PROD 03:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
6. Intelliwave Technologies: PROD; notified Tspearing (talk · contribs) 07:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone.
7. Norconex: PROD 08:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
8. Customer1: PROD 04:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
9. Fanzter: PROD 04:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
10. Smartlogic: PROD 09:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone.
11. Clone Algo Inc: PROD 09:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
12. Kurtosys: PROD; notified Ystonem (talk · contribs) 01:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
13. CartonCloud: PROD 01:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
14. LogiSense: PROD 04:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
15. Runiter: PROD 04:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
16. DefenderMX: PROD 06:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for products.
17. Intelliquip: PROD 06:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
18. Varrow: PROD 04:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.

November 2020

1. Square 9 Softworks: PROD 03:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone.
2. Arrayent: PROD 06:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies
3. Centriq Training: PROD 06:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
4. ReServe Interactive: PROD 07:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
5. Tavant Technologies: PROD; notified Vibhormishra (talk · contribs) 02:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
6. Campus Management Corp.: PROD 02:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. (This was the only source I could find that even came close to showing notability.
7. Gigmax: PROD 10:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
8. Falafel Software: PROD 13:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
9. Verix: PROD 14:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
10. BettrLife: PROD 07:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
11. Primer Archives: PROD; notified Chelseaspace (talk · contribs) 07:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
12. Vmailapp: PROD 14:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. I only found one article that could potentially contribute to notability (even that is probably excluded as hyperlocal coverage under NCORP).
13. Lollybot Collective: PROD 04:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for organisations. Note that "attention solely from local media ... is not an indication of notability".
14. Owlparrot Inc: PROD 06:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
15. EHealth Technologies: PROD 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional tone. Searches overwhelmingly return results for the generic term.
16. Ampronix: PROD 06:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
17. Tescra: PROD 06:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Recreated multiple times, consider salting.

January 2021

1. Dakota Software: PROD 08:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
2. Simple.com: PROD 08:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Patents and lawsuits are not considered sufficient coverage.
3. Powernex: PROD; notified Doseiai2 (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline.

May 2021

1. Myreno411: PROD 14:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Blatantly promotional, could almost be speedy-deleted. The only possibly passable source I found was this piece in the Ottawa Citizen, but even that read like a puff piece.
2. Truth In Aging: PROD 14:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Blatantly promotional, fails the general notability guideline.

June 2021

1. Commission Factory: PROD 01:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. The only potentially promising sources I found were the Sunshine Coast Daily ones, but they read like thinly-disguised press releases and in any case NCORP requires multiple independent sources.

August 2021

1. Usablenet: PROD 06:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Highly promotional tone. Created by a single-purpose account from LaunchSquad, a PR firm (see diff)

November 2021

1. Aternity Inc.: PROD 09:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Note the WSJ piece is brief, routine coverage of an acquisition. This type of source is specifically considered trivial for the purposes of NCORP.
2. VeriStor Systems: PROD 09:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
3. Transzap: PROD 10:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.

February 2022

1. Microsoft Learning Gateway: PROD 13:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline. Highly promotional. Creator is a single-purpose account blocked for advertising. ITWorx, the company associated with the product, has a long history of having its page deleted and recreated (see deletion log)

July 2023

1. Jann Knijnenburg: endorsed PROD. 05:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Judging from initial revision this is possibly a case of Wikipedia being improperly used as a memorial.
2. Usatine Media: PROD 01:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
3. Blue Whale Systems: PROD 03:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.

April 2024

1. Canopy Innovations: PROD 10:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. Sources already in the article are either non-independent, unreliable or do not mention Canopy. Best sources I found outside were mere passing mentions: [2] [3]. Previously G11'd. Concerns previously raised by IP at the Help desk.
2. Paramount Defenses: PROD 10:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. No remotely usable sources.
3. Pingboard: PROD 09:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Database searches only turned up passing mentions.
4. Symphonic Source, Inc.: PROD 09:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. No remotely usable sources.
5. Taskfreak: PROD; notified Je ne détiens pas la vérité universelle (talk · contribs) 10:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline.
6. Chris Oliver (software engineer): PROD 01:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline. I considered redirection to JavaFX where he is mentioned, but upon investigation he may not even be the most prominent software engineer named "Chris Oliver", so I worry this would be misleading.
7. Joanna Lambert: PROD; notified FloridaArmy (talk · contribs) 04:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for people. Sources are either not independent or do not provide significant coverage.
8. SkilledUp: PROD 05:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
9. Television school: PROD 16:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Not even mentioned in Wayne's own article.

May 2024

1. Voxofon: PROD 15:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
2. Redcort Software: PROD 13:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Obvious paid SPA. Maybe a case for its product being notable but notability is not inherited.
3. KeyedIn Solutions: PROD 13:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
4. Snapt Inc.: PROD 08:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Created by paid SPA. Defunct.
5. Cloudwords: PROD 10:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are routine funding announcements, biz journal interviews, hire announcements, TechCrunch etc.
6. Inkd: PROD 11:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
7. Analytica (company): PROD 05:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Created by paid SPA.
8. Torbit: PROD 15:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Apparently I was the editor who tagged this as potentially non-notable four years ago? Not sure why I didn't immediately PROD...
9. SwellPath: PROD 07:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
10. Local Yokel Media: PROD 07:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
11. SeeVolution: PROD 03:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are either trivial (routine funding announcements), non-independent, or unreliable.
12. Velocify: PROD; notified JesseRafe (talk · contribs) 03:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are either trivial (routine announcements of funding, name changes, product releases, acquisitions, or winning insignificant awards), non-independent, or unreliable (Forbes contributors). Checked for decent sources under both "Velocify" and "Leads360" and could not find any.
13. Zingaya: PROD 13:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.

June 2024

1. RuralShores: PROD 14:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional to the extent there is nothing worth preserving here.
2. Cheqbook: PROD 15:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Coverage is trivial (routine launch announcements) or unreliable.
3. Hoopla Software: PROD 13:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial (routine funding announcements).
4. Loader.io: PROD 14:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for products. Created by a single-purpose account. Sources are unreliable, non-independent or trivial mentions.
5. Ready4: PROD 15:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial (routine funding announcements) or non-independent.
6. Evolven: PROD 03:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies, heavy COI editing. Sources are trivial or non-independent.
7. Nusym Technology: PROD 14:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Created by SPA with near-certain conflict of interest.
8. Atala T: PROD 02:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. I can't even find the usual trivial coverage, there's just nothing.
9. Dynamsoft: PROD 02:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Chronic COI editing.
10. SCM Anywhere: PROD 02:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for products. Parent company Dynamsoft also PRODed.
11. Fortune Features: PROD 14:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Doesn't appear to have notable filmography either: The Living Matrix has an article but the sourcing seems dubious and it does not mention Fortune Features, so I don't favour a redirect. Couldn't find any sources better than [4]. Some COI editing apparent.
12. Recondo Technology: PROD; notified Vlmagee (talk · contribs) 15:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial (funding announcements, personnel updates, acquisition announcements, non-notable awards) or non-independent. Apart from usual internet checks I also checked the 2017 version which had more sources, but none were any good either.
13. Pyze: PROD 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial (routine funding announcements, product launch announcements). Created by blocked SPA, reviewer banned for paid editing.
14. Acrocat Software: PROD 03:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
15. VWorkApp: PROD 04:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
16. Pop Market: PROD 08:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
17. Razor Creative: PROD 09:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies, although I am tempted to leave it to showcase the nominative determinism involved in an advertising firm founded by a guy named "Brander".
18. Backbone Connect: PROD 13:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Created by founder.
19. Tribold: PROD 04:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial (routine announcements of acquisition and location-opening).
20. Cibecs: PROD 05:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are non-independent or trivial.
21. CipherGraph Networks: PROD 13:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Article crated by founder.
22. Second Intention: PROD 15:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Creator likely has (had? 2006 is a long time ago!) conflict of interest. Don't know why A7 was declined before: there's nothing mergeable here.
23. Delight Mobile: PROD 02:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.

July 2024

1. IVI Ryo Corporation: PROD 14:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Unsourced since creation in 2015.
2. Swivler: PROD 14:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Patents do not confer notability. Nowtash et al. is an undergraduate project report (https://digital.wpi.edu/pdfviewer/37720f407) with little mention of Swivler anyway.
3. Snap Kick Productions: PROD 10:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. This article has had literally no prose for 13 years and no-one noticed? Linked at Sin-Jin Smyth but I have serious doubts over whether that film is notable, plus it's not actually discussed in the article, so I don't consider redirection a viable alternative.
4. Scorpion Bay Hot Sauce: PROD 11:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Though I'm tempted to keep just for the fact the founder is called Burns.
5. ThinkHotels.com: PROD 14:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
6. Mosaic451: PROD 12:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Page hijacked in 2016 and no-one noticed. Sources are trivial or non-independent.
7. Prestige Diesels: PROD 13:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Being quoted in the media and winning some trade awards does not demonstrate notability.
8. Tecrea: PROD 14:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Almost exclusively cited to company website. Gets a few passing mentions in academic papers but nothing substantive.
9. Nodefly: PROD 06:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial or non-independent. StrongLoop doesn't seem notable either.
10. Justin Lefkovitch: PROD 17:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the general notability guideline. Promotional to the point of being G11-worthy.
11. IStreet Giving: PROD 17:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Created by co-founder. Close to A7-worthy and I certainly wouldn't object if someone decided that were warranted.
12. Mirrored Media: PROD 01:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Promotional to the point of being G11-worthy.
13. Testing Mom: PROD 02:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are non-independent or passing mentions (e.g. the NYT source just quotes the cofounder in a general article on gifted programs).
14. Sixjax: PROD 02:46, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
15. Jargon Software: PROD 10:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
16. Dade2: PROD 06:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
17. ISFuel: PROD 06:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.
18. OnGreen: PROD 06:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails the notability guideline for companies.