User:Sashashekhar/sandbox/Wolk v. Kodak
Wolk seeks 1) declaratory judgment 2) injunction
alleges 1) direct copyright infringement 2) secondary copyright infringement 3) interference with advantageous business relationships.
References: Summary/commentary
http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/photo_hosting_s.htm[1]
http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/wolk_v_kodak.htm[2]
http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Wolk_v._Kodak_Imaging_Network[3]
http://about.bloomberglaw.com/law-reports/photobucket/[4]
http://www.americanbar.org/publications/landslide/2011_12/may_june/recent_developments_ip_law.html[5]
http://www.martindale.com/internet-e-commerce/article_Edwards-Wildman-Palmer-LLP_1416008.htm [6]
Court Opinion
[7] https://www.casetext.com/case/wolk-v-kodak-imaging-network-inc
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3878548313413303059&hl=en&as_sdt=2006
- ^ Goldman, Eric. "Photo Hosting Site Gets DMCA 512 Safe Harbor–Wolk v. Photobucket". Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Goldman, Eric. "Photobucket Qualifies for the 512(c) Safe Harbor (Again)–Wolk v. Kodak". Technology and Marketing Law Blog. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ "Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network". IT Law Wiki. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Mckinney, Jessica. "SDNY GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS OF PHOTOBUCKET.COM AND KODAK DEFENDANTS IN DMCA DISPUTE". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Gatz, John C. "Recent Developments in IP Law". Landslide (ABA). Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Friel, Alan L. "Image Hosting Service Wins Summary Judgment in SDNY Copyright Suit". martindale.com. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ a b Wolk v Kodak Imaging Network, Inc., 10 Civ 4135 (SDNY 2011-12-21).
four tildas to sign two equal signs flanking topic