User:Sardanis

WikiProject Philosophy task list

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.

Introduction

This page is an introduction to Sardanis, by himself.

History

I grew up in Coshocton, Ohio, but now reside in Columbus, Ohio, where I am an undergraduate philosophy major at Capital University.

Thought

Hereafter is basically what I think, and sometimes why. This is necessarily is a work in progress, as thinking is a process.

Knowledge and Understanding

The main distinction to make in the realm of "knowing" is that between Knowledge and Understanding. Knowledge is what is known based in language, and only captures dimensions (one at a time in its most basic assertions) of its object that are shared or common. Understanding is what is known as a system of relations, dimensions, causes, etc. and is adapted to every new situation as more information is given to the system. Understanding is alive in the mind. The application of understanding is a kind of conversation between general principles and particular situations (the universal and the unique), while understanding itself is an idealogy. Both Knowledge and Understanding are limited to the phenomenal world, as the noumenal is ultimately unknowable by a mind with limits.