User:Manc1234/Talk-Archive

Mike Chavez-Dawson

I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Mike Chavez-Dawson--There is a good number of citations and references. Jipinghe (talk) 18:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crime & Punishment Brewing has been accepted

Crime & Punishment Brewing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KSFT^C 21:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HB Reavis

The article HB Reavis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

re: Article for Deletion: HB Reavis

Out of those, I think only the The Wall Street Journal would make it clear the company is notable, but I cannot access it. If you can, can you paste the paragraphs which discuss the company to my talk? Then I can review them and think whether I'd like to withdraw the prod or not. PS. Any chance the company is listed at Slovakian Stock Exchange? While it is not a criteria for notability, I tend to think stock exchange listing is a good sign for importance. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, through it seems to be a mention in passing, not an in-depth treatment. How would you argue the company passes WP:NCORP? Also, you are welcome to deprod it, but we may need to continue this discussion at AfD. The notability of this company seems borderline to me (through I appreciate they seem to have shared some nice pics with Wikipedia a while back, good find in Commons). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Billshark

Hello Manc1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Billshark for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Mike Gentile (author)

Hi you recently edited the above article and removed 5 references without leaving an explanation why. I think it was an error so I'm going to revert your edit, if it was intentional you can edit it again but please explain why. Domdeparis (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Domdeparis thanks for the revert, no idea what happened there. I was doing a bit of tidying in visual edit so maybe it didn't save properly. I'll try again and retain the links this time! Manc1234 (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

No problem, happy editing! Domdeparis (talk) 13:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of FCS Computer Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FCS Computer Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FCS Computer Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 00:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Ashley Koff RD

I see you created a talk page for Ashley Koff (Talk:Ashley Koff RD) and included an "old AfD" template. Do you have the link to the discussion? The only thing I see on that date related to talk page is a speedy deletion for being a copy vio. Thanks! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Fabrictramp, I can't see any discussion - I thought you didn't need that for a G12 violation. Presumed it was an instant delete without discussion. Have I used the wrong template? Manc1234 (talk) 20:04, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

No, you definitely don't need a discussion for copyvio. But the template says "The result of the discussion was Delete", so that would lead people to think there was a discussion... --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Do you know the correct flag? I don't want to gloss over the fact that the article has been deleted in the past and that's the only template I could find. Manc1234 (talk) 01:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't, offhand. In this case I'd say it isn't critical, as they haven't repeated the copyvio. But if you find one, you're more than welcome to throw it on there. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:19, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mher Khachatryan (artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mher Khachatryan (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mher Khachatryan (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Brand Attic

Hello, Manc1234,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Brand Attic should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brand Attic .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)