User talk:Jquesada123

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jquesada123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to create new pages and add missing entries on category pages

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not an admin, but you are not blocked. Also, if you are logged in, you wouldn't be affected by an IP block. If you want to create pages, however, you have to be autoconfirmed, meaning you need 10 edits. That might be what the problem is. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jquesada123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 192.168.1.9. Place any further information here. Jquesada123 (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. You will need to turn off your VPN, clear your cache, and wait 24 hours to edit. 331dot (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh you must have been caught in an autoblock. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, the IP is not 192.168.1.9; that's your local IP on your local network. You appear to be using a blocked VPN. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jquesada123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually, I do not have a VPN

Decline reason:

From our side, you appear to be using a SoftEther VPN client, some of the time. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jquesada123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I have turned off my VPN

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, I agree with jpbordon's assessment above - this unblock request still came from a softether VPN client. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 05:24, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If your VPN is off you should be able to edit now. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 21:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This unblock request was on the same SoftEther VPN IP address. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blubabluba9990: Are you related to this editor in some way? ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 00:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he is my friend in real life, we are classmates. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I would think that being logged in would negate the block. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 16:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were editing just fine yesterday. In general, IP block exemption is granted only to users who either are in some place like China where it's truly necessary, or experienced users who can show some other good cause. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nabi Tajima have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nabi Tajima was changed by Jquesada123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974966 on 2021-07-20T12:58:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Large denominations of United States currency. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 02:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was, well, just trying to add an external link. Jquesada123 (talk) 23:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change other editor's comments, as you did here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_photography&diff=prev&oldid=1169406675 . Also, your edit summary was misleading... you did more than add a link, you changed someone else's comment.Miner Editor (talk) 16:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]