User:Happygal414/TikTok food trends/Green glitter Peer Review

Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
Is the content added up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
What are the strengths of the content added?
How can the content added be improved?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of "Homemaking"
Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Additional Resources

Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Happygal414

Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Happygal414/TikTok_food_trends?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): TikTok food trends

Evaluate the drafted changes

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Although your lead works well for the section you have drafted on 2022 trends in your sandbox, I am not sure how helpful it will be in the lead of the actual article.

Content

The content you have added is relevant to the topic and helpful to round out the article and keep it timely.

Tone and Balance

The content you added is neutral in tone and does not appear to be heavily biased. The content does not appear to attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References

Your new content is backed up by seemingly reliable sources. Although some of them appear to be magazine articles and one may be a blog, these sources are used solely for information on the food recipes so these sources appear to be adequate. Your links appear to work and your sources are current.

Organization

Your content is concise, clear, and easy to read. It is also well organized in sections that make the article flow nicely.

Overall Impressions

The article will be more complete with your added content. Adding 2022 trends will keep the article up to date and complete. The content added will be beneficial to the overall article by covering this year's trends. The content is clear and easy to read, making it helpful for readers seeking information on this topic. The content can be improved by continuing to fill in your descriptions of food items, as well as by potentially adding in more academic sources such as peer reviewed articles, if there are any published on this topic.

Your writing is well-written, clear, and to the point. I would suggest you continue to flesh out your content in a similar writing style to the one you are already using, as well as doing more research to see if you can find any academic sources on this subject. This will further improve your article by creating a more well-rounded approach and bring more credibility to your content. The most important thing you could do to improve the article would be to write descriptions for all of your listed food trends. Your well planned structure and writing style are admirable and will help me as I continue to work on my own article.