User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/habeas lawyers/Charles H. Carpenter
 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's rough notes page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. |
'Charles H. Carpenter Pepper Hamilton
"Pro Bono News". Pepper Hamilton LLP. June 2005. Retrieved 2007-09-05. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
"Charles H. Carpenter bio". Pepper Hamilton LLP. Retrieved 2007-09-05. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
"October 14, 2007, TD Blog Interview with Stephen Truitt and Charles Carpenter". The Talking Dog. October 14, 2007. Retrieved 2008-03-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Pedro Ruz Gutierrez, Joe Palazzolo (January 3, 2008). "Mukasey Launches Criminal Investigation in CIA Tape Case". Legal Times. Retrieved 2008-03-30. Carpenter says the criminal investigation is not enough for his client. 'It's not an adequate substitute,' he says. 'We want to know the truth, and we want to know whether evidence was destroyed in violation of the court order. My client's primary interest isn't in enforcement of criminal laws of the United States. His interest is in getting a fair trial.'
{{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)</ref>
Hani Saleh Rashid Abdullah
aka
Sa id Salih Sa id Nashir
Maher El Falesteny a.k.a Mahrar Rafat Al Quwari
Jess Bravin (2005-08-30). "Lawyers for Saudi Prisoner Ask Court to Throw Out Roberts Ruling". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2010-04-20. Lawyers for one of those prisoners, Rami bin Saad al-Oteibi of Saudi Arabia, filed their motion under seal on Friday. A court security officer cleared it for public release yesterday. The motion seeks to intervene in the Hamdan case and asks for a new hearing before a panel without Judge Roberts.
2005 CIA interrogation tapes destruction,
Mark Mazzetti, Scott Shane (March 28, 2008). "Tapes' Destruction Hovers Over Detainee Cases". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-29. One of the court orders, issued in July 2005 by Judge Richard W. Roberts of the Federal District Court in Washington, required the preservation of all evidence related to Hani Abdullah, the Yemeni prisoner at Guantánamo, who is accused of attending a Qaeda training camp in 2001 and other offenses. Judge Roberts said in a January order that Mr. Abdullah's lawyers had made a plausible case that Abu Zubaydah would have been asked about their client in interrogations.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
"Destroyed tapes come back to vex CIA". United Press International. March 28, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-29. In a suit brought by Hani Abdullah, a prisoner at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a federal judge has raised the possibility that the U.S. spy agency violated a court order to preserve all evidence relevant to the prisoner by destroying the tapes, The New York Times reported Friday.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Matt Apuzzo (25 January 2008). "Judge seeking details on CIA tapes". Contra Costa Times. Retrieved 2008-03-29. Roberts issued a three-page ruling late Thursday siding with Carpenter, who represents Guantanamo Bay detainee Hani Abdullah. The judge said the lawyers had made a preliminary "showing that information obtained from Abu Zubaydah" was relevant to the detainee's lawsuit and should not have been destroyed.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
"U.S. judge orders White House to explain destruction of CIA tapes". CBC News. 25 January 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-29. There's enough there that it's worth asking" whether other videos or documents were also destroyed, said attorney Charles Carpenter, who represents Guantanamo Bay detainee Hani Abdullah. "I don't know the answer to that question, but the government does know the answer and now they have to tell Judge Roberts.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Seattle Audubon Society v. Lyons, 871 F. Supp. 1291 (W.D. Wash. 1994), aff'd, 80 F.3d 1401 (9th Cir. 1996).
Iran-United States Claims Tribunal,
, 36 Fed. Cl. 482 (1996), aff'd, 139 F.3d 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1997), cert. denied sub nom. Gurney v. United States, 524 U.S.951 (1998).</ref>
http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2007/09/15/news/local/news04.txt
Wilner v. NSA warrantless wiretap
"Wilner v. National Security Agency". Center for Constitutional Rights. Retrieved 2009-03-15.
David Bario (2008-07-28). "Seeing Shadows". Legal Village. Retrieved 2009-03-15. </ref>
"U.S. asks to rewrite detainee evidence". Retrieved 2010-03-16. {{cite news}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)</ref>