User:Drocj

User Groups

This editor is a Novice Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

This user chats on the Wikimedia Community Discord server as Dekaiji.

This user lives in, or hails from,
New York City.

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

[[wiki]]This user is part of the wikification drive.

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Schools.
talk | articles

This user is a participant in WikiProject Paranormal.

This user is a member of WikiProject Espionage.

This user is a member of the LGBTQ community.

This user promotes efforts to counter
climate change

This user is an architect.

This user drinks coffee.

This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.

About

Hi, in my precious & scarce spare time I'll try and make some positive contributions to Wikipedia. As an architectural designer, my skills lend to organizing information for efficiency, readability, clarity & consistency.

Donating time as an editor is a constructive way to contribute to this vital internet tool I believe is too often taken for granted. I'm new to editing Wikipedia and am likely to make mistakes.

Please be patient with me and I'll try to extend every courteous civility I can.

Articles that interest me:

• UFO related topics
• Occupational burnout
• Futures studies

Future research topics:

-Dashi

-C. Wright Mills

Information

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community Links for newcomers welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Introductory tutorial Writing an article Community portal Tutorial The Teahouse (newcomer help) Main help desk Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. How to write better articles Copyediting: Tony1's redundancy exercises have helped me write easier sentences Drop the howevers: User:John/however Avoid WP:SENSATIONALism Quick and ugly check to see if your writing is too difficult: The Hemingway App. A readability score (Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease) over >45 is fairly okay. Another rule of thumb: 4S: short words, short sentences, short paragraphs, short articles. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science): use reviews, don't write them. Help Pages Tools Other Find Link Wikipedia:Teahouse Grouping citations Wikipedia Redirect Citation Templates Help:Shortened_footnotes Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/Progress Useful templates Wikipedia:Neutrality templates, in particular, {{Fringe theories}} {{POV}}—There is a current dispute about the article's neutrality. {{Unbalanced}} {{Undue-inline}}—Inline citation to tag a source which might have been given more prominence than justifiable. Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles, in particular, {{Unreliable fringe source}}—Inline citation to tag a specific sentence that may use a fringe source inappropriately. {{Verify credibility}}—Inline citation for a source that may be unreliable {{Third-party-inline}}—Inline citation to tag a specific sentence that may use a non-independent source inappropriately. Released into public domain I agree to release my text and image contributions, unless otherwise stated, into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under public domain terms, please check the multi-licensing guide.

Understanding Wikipedia

"Wikipedia only works in practice. In theory, it could never work." WP:ABOUT WP:INTRODUCTION Wikipedia Reliability of Wikipedia Criticism of Wikipedia WP:PLAINSIMPLE WP:The Missing Manual How Wikipedia Works Wikipedia Research Paper Wikimedia Strategy Product Whitepaper Wikimedia Contribution Taxonomy Wikimedia Content Scope Wikimedia Feature Map (documentation) Wikimedia Movement Priorities Wikimedia Strategic Plan Washington Post expose Antandrus' observations 9 reasons why women don't edit Wikipedia great read Why do people edit Wikipedia? Wikipedia and political disputes Who Reads Wikipedia? NY Review of Books essay great read New Republic essay great read Wikipedia is not therapy great read One woman's brilliant fuck you to Wikipedia trolls great read One Woman's Mission to Rewrite Nazi History on Wikipedia great read Understanding the vandal-fighting web Wikipedia works because of how many people participate in creating and checking its pages. All changes go through a virtual filter--a gauntlet--of intelligent computer and human review. Thousands of people are constantly scouring new changes, and millions of readers keep an eye out for anything that seems off. Because of this process, research studies have shown that Wikipedia is just as accurate as traditional encyclopedias, but its errors get fixed faster. We are living proof of the coders' motto that "With enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow". In other words, many hands make anything possible! 1. Edit filter (automatic pattern rejection) 2. CBNG (machine-learning artificial neural network bot) 3. Huggle, Igloo, Lupin's filtered list (human assisted regex/badwords) 4. STiki (cbng residual feed, missed vandalism, subtle vandalism--human assisted metadata and pattern based review) 5. Article watchlists, selective page and topic monitoring by users 6. Pending changes, live version delay, reviewed by autoconfirmed users 7. Semi-protection, prevents non-autoconfirmed users from editing 8. Full protection, prevents non-admins from editing 9. Official readers, journalists and subjects of articles who report mistakes in the news (not good!) 10. Random readers, millions of individuals who fix errors when they come upon them

Articles Contributed to

• Roswell Incident

Personal Reference

Wikipedians for reference:

Jake Orlowitz

Ser Amantio di Nicolao

Sturmvogel_66

Wikipedia articles for reference:

Guidance for younger editors

Featured articles

Vital articles

Wiki Project Architecture

Timeline of architectural styles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Architecture

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Architectural_styles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Architectural_design

Art and architecture

Aesthetics articles

Wikipedia Process:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment#Grades

Good article nominations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_by_alma_mater:_New_York_(state) (Add alma mater)