User:Dennis Brown/RfA/Onel5969

Review of Onel5969

This is an editor review for admin. Please do not modify it. Review performed by Dennis Brown and MelanieN.

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Stats

• First edit: 6 Nov 09, but just a few, really Dec 2013 [1]
• Total SUL edits: 54423
• Article contribs: 336 created [2], two of them deleted, one by request, the other was an invalid DAB page. 30,486 main space edits
• Project space: 1771
• User rights: autoreviewer, reviewer
• Summaries: Fine
• Block log: Clear

Recommendations

Some of these are just observations, things that might get noticed and you might have to explain at RfA, not necessarily critical but they might stand out a bit and need explaining as a candidate. Some areas may be intentionally blank if there is nothing to add about that area.

CSD

No Twinkle logging, will have to check manually.

PROD

No Twinkle logging, will have to check manually.

AFD

494 unique pages edited; accuracy 93.7%; thoughtful comments suggest searching has been done (not "per nom")

Of the 57 AfDs actually nominated by him, accuracy 58.3%; "keep" results were sometimes because article had been improved; withdrew nomination and self-closed if there were several "keep" !votes.

Oopsie, August 10, 2015: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Potsdam; nominated for deletion 10 minutes after creation; 10 additional articles were added to the AfD without notification at their pages. All were deleted anyhow, I guess per IAR.

NAC AFD

Not worried about this.

Copyright

No claims made that I'm aware of.

Sanctions (via [3])

[4] no sanction, boomerang on reporter who was blocked.

[5], thread died, reporting party had filed [6] where a page restriction was given, but no sanction.

Monthly contribs

Fine for over 20 months

Admin area experience

Lots of AFC experience, lots of AFD experience

Articles created

336, 334 still in place

User talk - fine

The talk page shows many, many conversations about articles he has reviewed at AfC. I am impressed with his thorough responses and his gentle, helpful tone.

Automated edits

Extremely high 33,451, I'm not sure how it could be that high.

Talk archive

Exists

Misc.

(Summaries, userboxes, signature, etc.)

Personal

Questions

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

Candidate area

Please list any GAs, FAs, DYK or other contributions. If you speak any foreign languages or have other noteworthy degrees or skills, list those as well. Also add any problems that are likely to be brought up at RfA, such as past blocks, bad disputes, Arb actions, or similar.