GA review Belitung shipwreck (reviewed by Hchc2009)
Hi
Thanks for taking the time to do the review. I will start putting in the amendments in a little while and drop you a note once completed. Chaosdruid (talk) 21:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Apologies, fell asleep on the settee - cold pizza is not that nice lol :¬(
I will go through the necessary amendments this morning/early afternoon and hopefully get them all addressed by late afternoon. (are you in an area over GMT+3?) Chaosdruid (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I love cold pizza! (provided it has peperoni on it). I'm on standard GMT, but I'm on leave this week, so will be about all day. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Apologies again, we are in the middle of an update to our HACCP policies and reapplying for licensing, I had a call out today so will let you know once finished. Chaosdruid (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I understand - no rush! Hchc2009 (talk) 06:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Can you please do me a favour and place some marker next to, or strike though, those you think have been addressed satisfactorily? I am getting lost going through them all and am a little worried that I might miss some. If you would rather not, would you mind if I placed something next to the ones that are not yet addressed so that I can remove the marker as I finish them? Chaosdruid (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Have gone through this morning and struck through as requested... Remaining issue is primarily what to do about the new volume, either in terms of making sure we've updated any new academic arguments, or in terms of ensuring that the citations for existing statements are as strong as possible. Let's discuss when our time zones reoverlap! :) 06:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that. I did of course leave the most difficult part till last lol. I'll get the other small ones finished in the next hour or so and then try and read through the pertinent PDF's to see if everything is up-to-date.
I am GMT based, though most often work at night, I do not know why I thought you might be ahead :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 09:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I have done most of the rest, just some final things to look at, and the route-map to modify. For some reason the yellow route is not present - I think I accidentally deleted that version and uploaded the previous version. I will fix that tonight and upload it, as well as add a little more to the route section. Chaosdruid (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Have done the same thing myself in the past (usually managing to delete my saved newer version from my hard drive in the process...!) Hchc2009 (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I think that is what I did as well :¬(
Thank you for your work reviewing the GA nom, and the pass, I will address the map issue and any other small items that may have been missed tonight, unfortunately I had to go into work today as we had a failed freezer.
It has been an enlightening experience, I suppose most peoples first GAs are. The plan is to develop it more thoroughly from the latest evidence from both the Sackler gallery catalogue, archaeological papers, and perhaps some Indonesian sources. It may take a month or two, or even three, but I really would like to get it up to FA standard. There is a lot of detail from Flecker about the wreck, as well as the new info from the Sackler catalogue - hopefully I can double its content, and maybe get permission for some underwater photos.
Once again, thanks for your help on improving it :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 18:31, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
It's an excellent topic for an article - I could well see it being suitable for FA in due course. If I can help at all as you progress it, do let me know. Cheers! Hchc2009 (talk) 19:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
