User:Canadian/templates i use
Appearance
These templates should never be used on other templates, as this leads to the appearance of very large numbers of articles being disputed.
Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.
For placement at top of an article
[edit]What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
{{Blpdispute}} |
|
Disputed biographies of living persons top | ||||||
{{Contradict}} |
|
Self-contradicting article top | ||||||
{{Contradict-other|[[Article]]}} |
|
One or both contradicting articles top | ||||||
{{Disputed}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||||||
{{Disputeabout|'''The topic of dispute'''}} |
|
Disputed articles with list of topics top | ||||||
{{Disputed-category}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||||||
{{Hoax}} |
|
Suspected hoaxes top | ||||||
{{Neologism}} |
|
Possible neologisms top | ||||||
{{notability| |
|
Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issue top | ||||||
{{notability}} |
|
Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose) top | ||||||
{{POV}} |
{{POV}} |
Disputed articles top | ||||||
{{POV-check}} |
{{POV-check}} |
Possibly biased articles top | ||||||
{{POV-title}} |
{{POV-title}} |
Disputed article sections under title | ||||||
{{TotallyDisputed}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||||||
{{Unencyclopedic}} |
{{Unencyclopedic}} |
Articles with unencyclopedic topic (not unused, although it may be redundant) top | ||||||
{{Unbalanced}} |
|
Articles which contain Unbalanced citations. | ||||||
{{Autobiography}} |
|
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that. | ||||||
{{Autobiography|date-flagged}} |
|
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that, with the date at which they were flagged. | ||||||
{{Conspiracy-article}} |
For placement at top of article or section
[edit]What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Multiple issues}} |
|
Top of article or section with three or more issues | ||
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
Top of article, section, or talk page | |||
{{Unreferenced}} |
|
Lacks attributions from reliable sources. See template page for special usages. | ||
{{Refimprove}} |
|
Possibly inaccurate articles top | ||
{{Citecheck}} |
|
At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited. | ||
{{Original research}} |
|
Possible original research. | ||
{{Synthesis}} |
|
Possible unpublished synthesis. (The text in quotation marks is replaced with the title of the article.) | ||
{{Advert}} |
|
Pages that promote commercial products or services | ||
{{Magazine}} |
|
Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | ||
{{Fansite}} |
|
Pages that read like a fansite instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | ||
{{Story}} |
|
Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopedic information. | ||
{{Content}} |
|
Above the site of dispute in article or section | ||
{{weasel}} |
|
Article or section that has weasel words | ||
{{peacock}} |
|
Article or section that has peacock terms | ||
{{Missing information|Info}} |
|
Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion | ||
{{Self-published|Source}} |
|
On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy. | ||
{{Incoherent}} |
|
Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message |
For placement in or at top of a section only
[edit]What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Disputed-section}} |
|
Disputed article sections under section header | ||
{{POV-section}} |
{{POV-section}} |
Disputed article sections under section header | ||
{{TotallyDisputed-section}} |
Disputed article sections under section header | |||
{{SectOR}} |
|
Section contains possible original research. | ||
{{POV-intro}} |
{{POV-intro}} |
Disputed article intro top |
For inline article placement
[edit]What to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
---|---|---|
{{fact}}, {{cn}} or {{citation needed}} |
After factual claims that need a citation to back them up. in-line | |
{{Verify source}} or {{Check}} |
After suspect citations or source references in-line | |
{{Lopsided}} |
One-sided statements in-line | |
{{Verify credibility}} |
After suspect citations or source references in-line | |
{{Dubious}} |
Disputed statements in-line | |
{{failed verification}} |
After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk. in-line | |
{{or}} |
After text passages based upon original research in-line | |
{{syn}} |
After text passages based upon improper synthesis in-line | |
{{Nonspecific}} or {{Unverifiable}} |
After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{fact}}. in-line | |
{{Who}} |
[who?] |
After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals. in-line |
{{POV-statement}} |
{{POV-statement}} | after passages that appear to have a non-neutral point of view. |
For placement on talk pages of articles
[edit]What to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Calm talk}} |
|
Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes. | ||
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
Top of article, section, or talk page | |||
{{Controversial}} |
Talk page top | |||
{{Controversial-issues}} |
Talk page top |