Template talk:Content

This template was considered for merging with Template:Importance-section on 29 October 2010. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Cascade uprotection

{{editprotected}} When I have tried to edit the doc subpage, a message that the subpage is protected because of "cascading" option have appeared. Can this be turned off? --58.89.68.123 (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some templates transcluded by this template such as Template:Documentation is fully protected because of cascading. --58.89.68.123 (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. For future reference, please make requests for unprotection at WP:RFPU. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry and thank you. --58.89.68.123 (talk) 08:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical space

Can someone work on this template to take less vertical space? It mostly uses a small font, but despite that it appears larger than other templates because of the interline spacing. Tijfo098 (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will work on this after TfM resolves. --Bsherr (talk) 01:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TfM

{{editprotected}} Please place {{Tfm|{{subst:PAGENAME}}|Importance-section}} on the top of the page. --Bsherr (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, although the merger needs more work, IMHO. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requested August 4, 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In order for this template to display well in {{Multiple issues}}, could someone please change it from:

| text  = The relevance of particular information in (or previously in) this article or section is '''[[Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute|disputed]]'''.<br />
<small>The information may have been '''removed''' or '''included''' by an editor as a result. Please see discussion on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]] considering whether its inclusion is warranted.</small>

to:

| issue = The relevance of particular information in (or previously in) this article or section is '''[[Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute|disputed]]'''.
| fix   = <br /><small>The information may have been '''removed''' or '''included''' by an editor as a result. Please see discussion on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]] considering whether its inclusion is warranted.</small>

Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 08:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 21:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical margin increase?

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

On the majority of articles, table of contents box is positioned too close to the lead section, making that specific part of articles layout looking not so nice. How about having about 10 pixels of spacing there, something like adding style="margin-top: 10px;" to the outer <div> element? It would make positioning of the content box much, much better... Thoughts? -- Dsimic (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've put this request on the wrong page, because this template just produces an orange article message box. Perhaps try WP:VPT? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing a direction! -- Dsimic (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link directly to the talk page section

I just added a feature to this template so that users can link directly to the relevant talk page section by optionally including the section name as the first parameter. Sparkie82 (t•c) 01:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]