Jump to content

User:Burkem/review list

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page consists of a list of all articles edited by User:Burkem, taken from Special:Contributions&target=Burkem at 9.30am on Saturday 4th November 2006. The list was then sorted alaphabetically, and duplicates removed, before being expanded into an outline annotated list.

It has been created to co-ordinate a cleanup of Burkem's unsourced edits (see User_talk:Burkem#Undoing_the_damage). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

To help keep track of the decisions on articles, please do not delete any of the entries on this page. If you think that no further action is needeed on an article, please just move the article's entry to #No further action needed, and annotate it as approporiate. Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

No further action needed

[edit]

If you disagree withn the assessment that no further action is needed on a particular article, please move the entry back to the top of the page and explain your reasons. Thanks!

  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • source added, but link is to a personal webpage; {{Unreferenced}} tag recently added --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
    • page appears to be being monitored by serveral editors, leave it to their attentions --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Actions:
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • One sentence added, which was removed few days later as hoax ~~ Phoe talk 20:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • Keep ~~ Phoe talk 20:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Actions:
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?:
  • Redirected?:
  • Observations:
    • A variation on "Baldwin I of Jerusalem" in the original fake genealogy. Choess 16:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
    • Delete. Choess 16:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Actions:
    • PROD and PROD2
    • deleted ~~ Phoe talk 20:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?:
  • Redirected?:
  • Observations:
    • A variation on "Baldwin II of Jerusalem" in the original fake genealogy. Choess 16:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
    • Delete. Choess 16:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Actions:
    • PROD and PROD2
    • deleted ~~ Phoe talk 20:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: No
  • Redirected?: Inappropriate
  • Observations:
    • Astonishingly few amendments by Burkem and a phenomenal number by others. - Kittybrewster 13:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
    • all amendmenst were reverted or corrected after and after ~~ Phoe talk 18:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • none ~~ Phoe talk 18:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Actions:
    • none ~~ Phoe talk 18:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • succession box changed by User:Burkem ~~ Phoe talk 23:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • revert
  • Actions:
    • reverted, ref added by User:Choess ~~ Phoe talk 23:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~


  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • he had added one link, which was removed immediately ~~ Phoe talk 13:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • clear, strong keep ~~ Phoe talk 13:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Actions:
    • none
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: yes
  • Redirected?: yes
  • Observations:
    • created in May as article, but redirected to the verified article Geoffrey II of Anjou after some days ~~ Phoe talk 08:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • none
  • Actions:
    • none ~~ Phoe talk 08:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • he had added one wikilink leading to a verified article ~~ Phoe talk 15:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • keep ~~ Phoe talk 15:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Actions:
    • none ~~ Phoe talk 15:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • he had added a link, which was removed in a later version ~~ Phoe talk 13:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • clear, strong keep
  • Actions:
    • none ~~ Phoe talk 13:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: yes
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • cleaned up by User:Choess, {{unreferenced}} added by User:Clown will .... (and so on) :-) ~~ Phoe talk 08:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • needs reference ~~ Phoe talk 08:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Actions:
    • reference added ~~ Phoe talk 08:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • one edit by Burkem (see diff), redirecting William FitzRichard to William, Count of Mortain, where the name FitzRichard never appears --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    • William FitzRichard held a number of fiefs in Cornwall, but was not count or earl. Some of the relationships in the article should perhaps be more qualified than they are (i.e., acknowledge uncertainties), but that will take some research; it's OK for the time being. Choess 21:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
    • Can someone with more expertise please check this? It looks very dodgy to me, and I think it should be reverted. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Agreed, and so done.
  • Actions:
    • Reverted the linkage of William FitzRichard to William, Count of Mortain. Choess 21:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: two edits by Burkem, reverted by Choess; majore rewrite by Choess 3rd October (see diff); further edits by Burkem, reverted 3 November 2006 by Phoe to last version by Choess. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:57, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
  • Actions:
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: Inappropriate no
  • Observations:
    • only succession box edited ~~ Phoe talk 13:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • Recommendations:
    • revert
  • Actions:
    • reverted ~~ Phoe talk 13:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: only succession boxes edited
  • Recommendations: revert
  • Actions: reverted by User:Phoe
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: Yes
  • Redirected?: No
  • Observations: From the fake "de Burgo" genealogu
  • Recommendations: {{prod}} and {{prod2}} already added. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Actions: None needed.
    • deleted ~~ Phoe talk 19:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: Yes
  • Redirected?: No purpose
  • Observations:
    • Wholly unreferenced and probably partly true/ partly false. RHaworth suggests delete. Choess has (later) removed some of the more outrageous parts. Kittybrewster 13:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
    • I suggest we rely on Choess recommendations - Kittybrewster 13:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Actions:
    • deleted ~~ Phoe talk 19:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC) ~~


  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations:
    • substantial edits by Burkem, but all tidied 2 Nov to Nov by Angusmclellan and Choess, with explanation of fallacies --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
  • Actions:
  • (history)
  • Created by Burkem?: no
  • Redirected?: no
  • Observations: fixed 3 Oct by Choess and and 14 Oct by Colonies Chris; furher edits by Burkem reverted 3 November 2006 by Phoe to last version by Colonies Chris --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Recommendations:
  • Actions: